Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Sean_Anthony
He seems confident that he gave a thorough investigation. We’ll see tomorrow.
2 posted on
07/06/2016 10:46:49 AM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: Sean_Anthony
A waste of time...nothing more than a Traitor’s Ball, theater.
4 posted on
07/06/2016 10:48:41 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Sean_Anthony
Let us know what they found out in a couple of years.
The only way it could have any impact is to televise it wall to wall.
Executive branch cronys simply are not intimidated any longer by Congress.
5 posted on
07/06/2016 10:49:00 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: Sean_Anthony
I hope it’s a blue ribbon committee, those are the best
To: Sean_Anthony
Why does the HOR even bother with committee hearings? That's where legitimate issues go to die. What the HOR has is the power of the purse, which they've abdicated. How about something dramatic like not funding AF1 when it's being used for political purposes? How about leaving Obama's illegal swarms of "migrants" with no money for funding the program that brings them in and supports them?
No wonder these self-serving jerks aren't earning an honest living.
Grrr......end of this rant.
7 posted on
07/06/2016 10:50:09 AM PDT by
grania
To: Sean_Anthony
So Hellary’s IT Brian Pagliano pleads the 5th but nothing too serious about that to charge anybody with any crime ay Comey?
8 posted on
07/06/2016 10:50:26 AM PDT by
tflabo
(truth or tyrrany)
To: Sean_Anthony
DOES Anyone out there really care what COMEY does anymore???
This guy is nothing more than a puppet lap dog for Obama!!
9 posted on
07/06/2016 10:50:32 AM PDT by
EnglishOnly
(Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
To: Sean_Anthony
If Jack the Ripper showed up to a GOP committee his popularity would skyrocket
To: Sean_Anthony
It seems to me that he went beyond the scope of his office by declaring that no reasonable prosecutor would charge this case. The role of the FBI is to investigate, not prosecute. So, I think the first question to Comey should be, "Who made the decision not to recommend charges?"
If he claims it was his decision, then it's pretty clear he overstepped his authority, and stepped on the toes of the career prosecutors.
And if it was not his decision, then he needs to say who it was, and that person (or persons) can be questioned why the facts would not support a prosecution, when they had prosecuted other similar cases.
It seems pretty evident that there was some pretty sticky things to go over before this decision was reached. Comey owes it to the American people, who ultimately are his boss, to clarify the decision-making process.
To: Sean_Anthony
These clowns will interrupt their fundraising cocktail parties to read what their aides hand them.
Is Cummings going to be there? Barf.
13 posted on
07/06/2016 10:53:58 AM PDT by
Fido969
To: Sean_Anthony
Upholding the rule of law for ALL people regardless of stature, and regardless of the political fallout?
Comey don't play dat!
14 posted on
07/06/2016 10:54:41 AM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Females DESTROYED America.)
To: Sean_Anthony
The FBI and the MSM now share the same level of credibility which is none.
15 posted on
07/06/2016 10:57:36 AM PDT by
Eddie01
To: Sean_Anthony
I think he was chomping at the bit to recommend an indictment but was told to back off. To me, that explains why he went into the litany of what info they did find. I think he resented being held back.
Otherwise, he just would’ve come out and said that after an exhaustive investigation, nothing illegal was discovered.
17 posted on
07/06/2016 10:59:08 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: Sean_Anthony
Now seeking new members
To: Sean_Anthony
More bloviating from repukelicans jack-wagons. Screaming whining defence from democRats. Nothing will change. Our government is a corrupt band of criminals.
19 posted on
07/06/2016 11:01:43 AM PDT by
vpintheak
(Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
To: Sean_Anthony
He’ll duck behind the “intent” part of the statute which most prosecutors do when the decision is “iffy.” The “intent” part of the statute is pure FOG, no measurement system for it at all. (If you want to hide ...)
20 posted on
07/06/2016 11:01:48 AM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
To: Sean_Anthony
24 posted on
07/06/2016 11:05:34 AM PDT by
ColdOne
(poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: Sean_Anthony
Hillary has one day to murder him.
29 posted on
07/06/2016 11:09:52 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Sean_Anthony
Comey...
Gowdy...
They’re wooking for wabbits hahaha...
34 posted on
07/06/2016 11:15:46 AM PDT by
glyptol
To: Sean_Anthony
He stonewalls, and bammy refuses to fire him. Republicans back down. As usual. End of discussion.
36 posted on
07/06/2016 11:25:12 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson