Yes, but the boy is doing it wrong. He is being indisceet and giving interviews to tabloids who love to air lurid stories. His true motives are suspect. Mom still wants her ‘piece of the pie’.
If he really wanted to know, he should have approached Bill Clinton cordially, by mail directly and waited. It’s likely his mom tried the same thing and also waited, never receiving a response.
That Clinton would not respond to this well known claim IS his response. Obviously, and for his own reasons, Bill Clinton does not wish to consider this young man as an heir. It’s likely there are several more women with several more children (and their spouses and by now Grandchildren) who want to make the same claims. Just because it would be “nice” and honorable for Clinton to give these two a fair hearing, he does not owe them this courtesy. I say all this as someone who will never under any circumstances vote for either Clinton.
He doesn’t owe them a courtesy. But he’s a rich SOB and he does have to answer a paternity suit. DNA doesn’t lie so he can’t even use legal sophistry to get out of it.
I hope the boy gets 18 years of back child support calculated on Clintons income during those years. Why should Clinton be exempt from the fate of every other man in America?