Rigging of National Elections – The Rise of Electronic Voting

The Coach's Team ^ | 10/19/16 | Ed Wood

[Oldpuppymax]

This piece was originally posted on November 20, 2013 on the Freedom Outpost website.

If this expose of voter fraud was presented as a stage play, it would be characterized as a Greek Tragedy; "a drama or literary work in which the main character is brought to ruin as a consequence of a tragic flaw, moral weakness, or inability to cope with unfavorable circumstances." Such is where we find ourselves. The main character(s) would be all those who fought and died to provide for us a form of government whose very foundation is the right to free and unencumbered elections.

There are so many acts in this play that it is difficult to know which to present next. If, after reading Act I, you still doubt that our elections are rigged, you can view the video and hear first-hand the sworn testimony of a Mr. Clinton Eugene Curtis before a select United States Senate Committee, admitting that he was retained by Congressman Tom Feeney, then Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, to develop a program for the specific purpose of determining the outcome of electronically tabulated elections.

This and other election-throwing computer programs became vital to the outcome of the 2012 presidential election. Voters in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas all reported that a vote for Romney resulted in either a direct or a default vote for Obama. The Market Daily News reported that in 100 Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Ohio precincts, Obama got 99% of the votes and Romney 0. In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received two votes or less. In Philadelphia, 59 precincts recorded not one single vote for Romney. And the list goes on. How is this...

[Dilbert San Diego]

In my opinion, electronic voting should be abandoned. Too much possibility of too much mischief.

I would rather wait days if necessary, to manually tally up paper ballots, and be more sure of the outcome, than have electronic systems which have been tampered with to ensure that Democrats win.

[FrankR]

@if(Trump=1’ then Hillary =2, else Hillary =1)

That one line added to the machines program could cause massive cheating for the dems.

(Note: I only know BASIC, Lotus Notes, Visual Basic, and a little JavaScript ). The line/syntax would be in what ever language is used in the voting machines)

[GOPJ]

I would rather wait days if necessary, to manually tally up paper ballots, and be more sure of the outcome, than have electronic systems which have been tampered with to ensure that Democrats win.

I'm with you Dilbert. Democrats pushed for these machines - and used the excuse 'ATM Machines' don't make mistakes"...

Well, there's NO INCENTIVE for a bank to short-change customers and have them run to the local newspaper and/or mover their banking elsewhere...

But there IS incentive for democrats to rig the vote - as they've done for years.

So, yeah bring back older systems that make it harder for Democrats to cheat.

[bgill]

Smartmatic, a U.K.-based voting technology company with deep ties to George Soros, has control over voting machines in 16 states including battleground zones like Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Other jurisdictions affected are California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3482349/posts

++++++++++++

Soros also owns SCYTL. This is at the top of their homepage - “Scytl’s technology used in the largest online election in the United States.” Check out their customers - https://www.scytl.com/en/scytls-technology-used-in-the-largest-online-election-in-the-united-states/

Dept of Defense - oh, that’s priceless
Alaska
Arkansas
Kentucky
Arizona
D.C.
Mississippi
Virginia
West Virginia
Florida
New York

Add Texas to the list. Any others missing?

Now, tell me the election isn’t rigged.

[oldtech]

For those found guilty of election rigging,would the death penalty be too strong?

[oldtech]

For those found guilty of election rigging,would the death penalty be too strong?

[wubjo]

For those found guilty of election rigging,would the death penalty be too strong?

NO!

Anyone attempting to alter or influence elect by overt or clandestine tampering MUST be dealt with harshly, it IS THAT SERIOUS.

SOROS SHOULD BE THE FIRST.