This is in addition to my first reply. This is the person who wrote that story (still on The Geller Report with no mention that the story is being denied by other sources):
“Griffing is an Associate Editor with The Daily Caller, an investigative journalist, media relations expert and public speaker who has been instrumental in demanding transparency in the public sphere. His interview credits include Fortune 500 executives, as well as key public officials. He helped run the largest Republican Political Action Committee (PAC) in Texas and served as ‘Executive Director’ of the largest county Republican Party in Texas.”
Wouldn’t you say that is a credible source and that it would make sense for me to post a link to what he wrote? Would you have seen that this person wrote the story and then decided it to be a false story? And then, if that story had been reported by another website as being false, would you feel like it would be justified for people to attack you for posting a link to that story as though you just should have know it to be untrue?
I’ll read what you have to say when you learn to format.
Till then it’s just so much blather.
Of course, given the history, it may well be just blather no matter how it’s presented.