Posted on 12/12/2016 2:09:08 PM PST by ColdOne
A federal judge has ordered the top science policy official at the White House to preserve all of his emails from a private account while a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit about the messages proceeds.
U.S. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler issued the order Monday, requiring Office of Science and Technology Policy Director John Holdren to load a thumb drive with all archived messages (including messages marked as deleted) from an account provided by his former employer, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Draining the swamp
There's a real tool.
hmmm?
Yes he is. Those emails will be a good read. (How to fabricate better looking hockey sticks.)
Yes, if Russia will release them.:)
...making sure the emails from Hillary are still there???...
Save not delete
Most White House offices are beyond the reach of FOIA, but the Office of Science and Technology is one of a few with duties assigned by statute that are covered by the access law.?
Ha. Ha. "
This has nothing to do with Trump.
“Save not delete”
Sorry, Your Honor, I’m dyslexic.
Well, when you issue that kind of order, you immediately dispatch an Officer of the Court to retrieve the affected equipment; or the documents can be downloaded while in the presence of a Court Officer, so it becomes the property of the Court immediately.
When you suspect foul play .. why are the Courts willing to let the accused handle the evidence ..??
It may be a rare order, but it’s likely to be even more rare if it’s obeyed...
What?? Why is this even needed? ALL emails from ALL employees should be recorded and stored. Ugh.
Now, the dyslexic excuse is worthy of a “silver” star for participation. Good suggestion ! !
Obama science czar Holdren called for forced abortions“There exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated,” wrote Obama appointee John Holdren, as reported by FrontPage Magazine. “It has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Holdren’s comments, made in 1977, mirror the astonishing admission this week of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who said she was under the impression that legalizing abortion with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members of the populace, or as she put it “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” - source
OOP!s! All emails accessed from work, private or otherwise, and any private emails discussing any work-related matter.
Bring your friends, I’m here all week. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.