Posted on 12/29/2016 8:07:33 PM PST by kevcol
Fascists thugs control academic almost without exception these days.
Yes and we can freely call him a nutcase unworthy to teach our kids
His people actually went through an episode of attempted genocide not long ago, you think he would maintain a low profile and not wish it on others. Nope.
Poor retard. He Christmas wish did not come true.
I hope someone tries it, maybe with a “deny all Muslims entry” statement.
You know, I’d completely forgotten about this story, and the stupid, stupid man it’s about.
Then Drexel goes and reminds me of it. Nice going, Drexel.
White is the New Nigger.
If this piece of filth would have called for “Black Genocide” or “Muslim Genocide,” Drexel would have denfended that, too, right?
/SARC
Where is any evidence that he is a “communist”? Did he admit it, was it published somewhere, or is this just someone’s comments?
If anyone has a direct source, please let me know.
The University is right, and he is right. He has the right to ‘freely’ (and I would assume that means publicly) express his opinion.
However, with rights come responsibilities. If you demand the right to speak freely in public, then you must be responsible for what you said. You must deal with the consequences.
In the USSR, people were always free to express their opinions. As long as those views were compatible with those of the Central Committee. So, the university response is not surprising.
Well then we can express genocidal ideas about any race then.
Got my copy.
Truth hurts.
How embarrassing and disgraceful for Drexel to have such a racist influencing young minds. Anyone who advocates genocide exclusively on the basis of just their skin color must be completely insane.
He admitted it and he writes communist books.
It would seem only fair to start the “White Genocide” with Professor George Ciccariello-Maher — and then see if he still advocates it... ‘-)
George Ciccariello-Maher January 8, 2014 · .. I had always assumed the Communist Manifesto played a major role in marking the workers' movement as "communist" (especially since the Paris "commune" didn't come til 1871). But this doesn't account for the pre-existing "specter of communism" - any idea what or who Marx and Engels were referring to? Who, besides "Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies," was decrying communism and why? (An abiding interest in how imposed identities are reappropriated). George Ciccariello-Maher January 8, 2014 · .. I had always assumed the Communist Manifesto played a major role in marking the workers' movement as "communist" (especially since the Paris "commune" didn't come til 1871). But this doesn't account for the pre-existing "specter of communism" - any idea what or who Marx and Engels were referring to? Who, besides "Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies," was decrying communism and why? (An abiding interest in how imposed identities are reappropriated).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.