Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Celtic Conservative

Linear motors predate the Disney project by decades. I used them in semiconductor equipment in the 70’s.


35 posted on 01/30/2017 5:12:11 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("It's a war against humanity!" Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$; Celtic Conservative

Mad_as_he$$ is correct. The Navy started the work on the electric catapult way back before 1982 and it was kicked around for quite a bit longer before then. Near as I can tell the first roller coaster using this technology was in 1996 (http://coasterpedia.net/wiki/Launched_roller_coaster)

A point that I don’t think was mentioned in the steam vs electric catapult discussion is that a steam catapult MUST be kept warm at all times. This requires a constant expenditure of energy to keep it at operating temperature (not to mention the energy required to keep steam pressure available).

An electric catapult is more like a light bulb. When not turned on it uses no energy.

This is why the sortie rate can be increased. There is essentially no recharge time between shots (depending on your electric power available of course and Ford has the power) and the net energy usage is less per shot.


40 posted on 01/30/2017 5:43:29 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson