Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cheerio

Courts have long held that Congress cannot “bind” future Congresses—that is, it can’t force a future session of Congress to carry on its own policies. That practice, formally known as “legislative entrenchment,” is seen as privileging one group of lawmakers over another, “binding” future to the priorities set in the present.


3 posted on 02/09/2017 1:53:44 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana

Article: “Congress is required by statute to fund it”

Your comment: “Courts have long held that Congress cannot “bind” future Congresses—that is, it can’t force a future session of Congress to carry on its own policies.”

I think you are right there, 2banana. Hensarling should file a bill to defund this leftist boondoggle pronto. Let the ACLU sue, but if the House doesn’t buckle, Richard Cordray and the rest of Fauxcahontas’s hand-picked Stalinists at this agency can work for no pay.


8 posted on 02/09/2017 2:09:36 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson