Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomStar3028

Having an attraction to post pubescent teenagers (15-20) is not pedophilia.

****************************************

Umm, big difference between 15 and 20. The fact that you put them in the same category is disturbing.


15 posted on 02/21/2017 7:06:33 PM PST by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: kara37

“The fact that you put them in the same category is disturbing.”

I’ve been reading of this dross lately... on FR. And I’m not happy.

Not happy at all.

Kids have enough BS to learn and experience and grow into without some creep trying to screw up their lives before they even have a chance to start.

When I was 32 I, rather mistakenly, dated an 18 year old girl. I got all sorts of pats on the back and “Right ons”, but ultimately my mere presence (However non-creepy it could have been) was nothing but harmful.

The modern American has more to develop than anyone of us have. Leave them alone to grow - even beyond 18 years. 30 year olds have no good business being with 18 year olds.


26 posted on 02/21/2017 9:05:20 PM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: kara37

What’s disturbing is emotional outrage, what’s disturbing is worshiping an openly queer male just because he’s against PC. 95% of men when shown slides will pick teenagers as attractive. This is a fact.


30 posted on 02/22/2017 12:40:20 AM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson