Posted on 03/06/2017 9:54:34 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Bugging of Trump, and other Republicans, a larger cover-up than Watergate, because the Democrats consciously created the "Russia is in collusion with Trump and the Republicans" narrative to cover-up their own illegal wire-tapping activities.
Was the whole thing about having allegations about Russian intrusion into our election all about covering up the fact that the Democrats were wire-tapping Trump, and other Republicans, already? But, to avoid a Watergate scenario, in case it was found out, they could simply attach it to the Russian influence allegations? Was the plan to point fingers at the GOP and Russia being in cahoots with each other dreamed up so as to explain away illegal, Watergate-style wiretapping, so that it would be easier to get away with it in case the reality of what the Democrats were doing got out there?
On Saturday, March 4, 2017, during the second hour of Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs, we addressed the allegations that Barack Obama used illegal wiretaps against Donald J. Trump during the election season. Here’s a transcript of what we said:
The MSM keeps touting the line “with no evidence”. We already have (thanks Mr. Levin) lots of evidence. I say “orange is the new black....for Obama and Lynch”!!!
No wonder Hillary has been silent. No matter about Bubba meeting Lynch...
He bugged me for 8 years and nobody gave a crap. ;-)
There was Russian influence/hacking so they needed wiretaps.
OR
They had wiretaps so they needed Russian influence/hacking..........
They used this premise so they could spy on Trump’s campaign pure and simple. They will say they had reason to believe Trump and his team were in cahoots with the Russians.
They weren’t but this was done so as to give cover for their spying.
I just LOVE our First Lady.
She Reflects me!!!
I know, I know off subject.
Hey Uversabound,
Thought I’d fall off the couch laughing when the First Lady was introduced at his big speech and EVERY male attendee jumped to their feet looked up at her, got a huge smile on their faces and cheered mightily.
In June, 2016, Loretta told Bill, or vice-versa, (What difference does it make), “We better get a FISA request to cover our behinds.” So, they go through the motions, but it’s turned down. They’re covered though because if a FISA is in process, they can claim plausible deniability, or we’re applying for a new one later, working on it now.
In October, 2016, they panicked when they saw Trump might win. They watered down the FISA, left Trump’s name out, and applied again. This one was approved and Obama is smiling thinking, “Now I’m covered.” He was golfing and telling illegals to vote and probably didn’t even think he might be in trouble as he thought the deep state had guaranteed a Hillary win. Either way, he’s smiling and has plausible deniability, or so he thinks. He thinks he’s untouchable.
Hey Obama, No you’re not. What you did was unlawful, despicable, smacks of tyranny and will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. This behavior is not and will not be permitted by persons in power in these United States. This is not the Soviet Union or a Banana Republic. Your war on America is about to cease. Every movement, every call, every discussion in now being monitored by the full extent of the surveillance capability of the United States. Bank on it. Tread softly and forget about the stick. We are watching you.
bkmk
She is lovely. Just lovely.
May I bring up the reason why liberal woman are liberal woman?
Not very lady like....LOL
Now that is funny.
You go Freeper.
Great pic! Could you please send me the URL for purposes of posting on message boards? Thanks!
Makes one wonder where Harry Reid got his “Mitt paid no income taxes” blather, doesn’t it?
Disclaimer - I am NOT a Mittens fan.
THANKS SO MUCH!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.