Replies

Actually, it can all be seen right here, without all the javascript and popups.

*******

The Nork EMP—Part 3—Iran, And CASCADING FAILURES
May 13, 2017 ~ rightwingconservativenewsblog

This is from the Free BeaconFrom David “Dave” Benham, U.S. Pacific Command, Fox News, May 12, 2017

‘Depending on the specific characteristics of the attacks, unprecedented cascading failures of our major infrastructures could result,’ the 2004 commission warned in a statement. ‘In that event, a regional or national recovery would be long and difficult and would seriously degrade the safety and overall viability of our Nation.’

A lot of people in the (perhaps, fatally) distracted US media, as well as apparent, armchair “commenters and posters,” still openly poo-poo the idea of a Korean EMP attack on America.

I don’t know why. Except to say that in some cases there seems to be almost a kinetic need for this sort of denial. A mysterious, occulted, inner knowledge—a feeling that— despite conspiracy-facts—everybody else is just wrong.

“Oh, even if there were an EMP attack, it would take a really long time for people to be affected, and we could handle it.” This sort of critic seems to believe that they will be able to “lock and load,” break out the freeze-dried lasagna, “molon labe,” and survive in the mountains on goat milk.

What they do not seem to know about, or take into account—whilst still ignoring the reality of a possible EMP attack—is the principle of the above-cited, “Catastrophic, Cascading Systems Failures.”

From Wikipedia:

Catastrophic Failure.

A catastrophic failure is a sudden and total failure from which recovery is impossible.

Catastrophic failures often lead to cascading systems failure.

The term is most commonly used for structural failures, but has often been extended to many other disciplines in which total and irrecoverable loss occurs….

…A cascading failure is a failure in a system of interconnected parts in which the failure of a part can trigger the failure of successive parts. Such a failure may happen in many types of systems, including power transmission, computer networking, finance, human bodily systems, and bridges.

Cascading failures usually begin when one part of the system fails. When this happens, nearby nodes must then take up the slack for the failed component. This in turn overloads these nodes, causing them to fail as well, prompting additional nodes to fail one after another in a vicious circle.

So, as I hope the disbelievers can now see, the question of an EMP attack on America is not just simple numbers of kilotonage, blast area, Mountain House dried foods in bulk, or “molon labe.”

An apparently, severely weakened and degraded America, was recently unable to even handle one, lone terrorist—a lousy little kid—in Boston.

Not even an army of police got this terrorist who blew up the Boston Marathon and killed people. No. It was some guy who “broke the Government narrative,” by not “sheltering in place,” and who went out into his yard to catch a smoke, and spotted him.

Do you understand now? One attack on a limited amount of territory can theoretically bring down an entire country. Especially a country that has done Nothing to protect its electrical grid. Especially a country apparently divided into “thinkers and emotioners,” who are diametrically opposed, and who never seem to agree on anything that disrupts their public narratives.

Cascading failure in power transmission

Cascading failure is common in power grids when one of the elements fails (completely or partially) and shifts its load to nearby elements in the system. Those nearby elements are then pushed beyond their capacity so they become overloaded and shift their load onto other elements.

Cascading failure is a common effect seen in high voltage systems, where a single point of failure (SPF) on a fully loaded or slightly overloaded system results in a sudden spike across all nodes of the system. This surge current can induce the already overloaded nodes into failure, setting off more overloads and thereby taking down the entire system in a very short time.

This failure process cascades through the elements of the system like a ripple on a pond and continues until substantially all of the elements in the system are compromised and/or the system becomes functionally disconnected from the source of its load. For example, under certain conditions a large power grid can collapse after the failure of a single transformer.

Fox News:

On July 9, 1962, Hawaii was hit by a massive electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack, which within minutes took down the state’s communications systems and traffic lights — virtually everything that ran on electricity.

The EMP wasn’t an attack by a foreign government; rather the U.S. government had set off a 1.4-megaton nuclear warhead at a height of 248 miles above Johnston Atoll in an operation the military named “Starfish Prime.” The test caused radio disruptions in Hawaii, California, and Alaska, and knocked out six satellites above the Pacific.

“Nobody expected this to happen,” we are told, because the test site was some 850 miles away from Hawaii.

With North Korea developing its nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile capabilities, Hawaii defense experts are concerned North Korea could target the 50th state with an EMP attack. Such an explosion, if executed high enough in the atmosphere, could be hundreds of miles from Hawaii and still damage its operations and communications.

“This is not theoretical. It has already happened,” said Clairmont, noting significant damage was done to both civilian and military electrical and communications systems.

The concern regarding the threat of an EMP attack on Hawaii’s electrical grid and communications systems “is real and must be taken seriously,” U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, told Fox News.

“Almost every aspect of our lives is reliant on electricity, much more so than in 1962 — everything from banking to health care to communications to automobiles — so you can imagine the devastating impact such an attack could have,” Gabbard said.

In Hawaii, there is an added layer of risk even if the attack were not directed at Hawaii, Gabbard said.

Conversely, a nuclear attack on, say, the port and city of Los Angeles, could affect the entire state of Hawaii. (As well as a large cascading failure throughout a significant part of the entire continental United States.)

“If an attack occurred on the mainland and the electric grid were shut down on the West Coast, it would create a crisis in Hawaii through the total disruption of our food and energy supply chain,” Gabbard said.

If there were an attack on California, it would likely knock out a lot more of the electrical grid by means of a catastrophic cascade of subsequent, rolling failures. No one can say how far or how fast this might spread. Not even our “brilliant” media, or our well-meaning commentors and posters.

Now, the question also arises: what technological influence does Iran have on North Korea, or North Korea on Iran? Are they cooperating to develop deliverable nuclear weapons systems? If one of them has some techno-advance, does the other also have it?

IMG_8236

Because Iran—apparently enabled by Barack Hussein Obama—seems to be ignoring many of the “nuclear ‘deal’ restrictions,” and moving hell-for-leather to increase and advance its weaponry.

This is from The Free Beacon, by Adam Kredo, May 12, 2017:

Iran continues to make critical technological strides in its efforts to perfect an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering nuclear weapons over great distances, efforts that violate international prohibitions, according to the director of national intelligence, who informed Congress this week that the Islamic Republic “would choose ballistic missiles as its preferred method of delivering nuclear weapons.”

The disclosure comes just days after Iranian leaders announced the upcoming launch of two new domestically produced satellites. Iran has long used its space program as cover for illicit missile work, as the know-how needed to launch such equipment can be applied to long-range ballistic missile technology.

Daniel Coats, America’s top spymaster, informed Congress this week in an intelligence briefing that Iran’s ballistic missile work continues unimpeded and could be used by the Islamic Republic to launch a nuclear weapon, according to unclassified testimony….

…”We judge that Tehran would choose ballistic missiles as its preferred method of delivering nuclear weapons, if it builds them,” according to Coats. “Iran’s ballistic missiles are inherently capable of delivering WMD, and Tehran already has the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle East.”

“PENTAGON EYES IRAN-NORTH KOREA MILITARY CONNECTION,” FOX NEWS, MAY 5, 2017:

“…In the past, we would see things in North Korea and they would show up in Iran. In some recent years, we’ve seen some small things appear in Iran first and then show up in North Korea and so that raises the question of whether trade — which started off as North Korea to Iran — has started to reverse….”

“…Iran’s attempted cruise missile launch from the midget submarine in the Strait of Hormuz was believed to be one of the first times Iran has attempted such a feat. In 2015, North Korea successfully launched a missile from a submarine for the first time, and officials believe Tehran is not far behind….

“…Iran also is pursuing a massive buildup of its military, which observers have described as unprecedented.

The U.S. intelligence community has confirmed that Iran is developing “a range of new military capabilities to monitor and target U.S. and allied military assets in the region, including armed UAVs [drones], ballistic missiles, advanced naval mines, unmanned explosive boats, submarines and advanced torpedoes, and anti-ship and land-attack cruise missiles…”

Let’s look at a few things.

North Korea has the means to deliver and EMP strike on America, either from its two orbiting satellites, or by some other means.

Conceivably, North Korea could use its own technology, or that of Iran, to launch a limited range missile at Hawaii, or California.

They could also possibly launch from submarine, neaby a chosen US target. American forces were recently unable to track 50 North Korean submarines when they suddenly all sailed off at the same time.

And one North Korean sub is “missing,” wherabouts still unknown.

Iranian forces have reportedly had success in at least one submarine missile launch. Ergo, why not North Korea—by means of sharing technology?

Here’s an even greater nightmare: a simultaneous attack by BOTH North Korea AND Iran.

Given the apparent level of insanity, hatred of America, and/or desire for world conflagration, or regional dominace—why not?

IMG_8434

From WND.Com, June 27, 2013, By Reza Kahlili:

Shiites, whose clerics rule Iran with an iron fist, believe that at the end of times, the 12th Imam, Mahdi, a 9th century prophet, will reappear with Jesus Christ at his side, kill all the infidels and raise the flag of Islam in all four corners of the world.

Many analysts believe Iran is seeking nuclear capability to bring on that Armageddon.

Based on hadiths by Muhammad and his descendants, the Syrian revolution is a start to the coming of Mahdi, Hosseinian said in a speech quoted Thursday by Fars News Agency, a media outlet run by the Revolutionary Guards.

“Imam Sadegh (the Shiites’ 4th Imam) has stated, when the masters of the yellow flag (Lebanese Hezbollah) engage in a conflict with anti-Shiite elements in Damascus and Iranian forces join them, this is a sign and a prelude to the coming of his highness (Mahdi),” Hosseinian said….

…Hosseinian told the audience that they should prepare themselves for war.

“The coming of his highness is assured … the prophet has promised that people from the east, which according to the hadith means Iran, take power [world conflagration] and prepare for the government of Imam Mahdi.”

old-city-jerusalem

So.

In summation and closing: stay ready.

And, as they say these days—molon labe….