““The system of ‘traditional values’ is a way to find an enemy. ‘Traditionalism versus liberalism’ helps us to fight liberals,” he told me. Although the traditional-values agenda is sometimes framed in terms of positive goals, such as putting a premium on families and childbearing, Chapnin argues it’s more often a negative project that consists of fighting LGBT activists, same-sex marriage activists, and pro-choice activists.”
When a culture war is being waged you had best be setting guards, at a minimum, where the enemy is seeking to advance.
If the cultural Marxist were not actively pushing the perverted, the insane and the murder of the innocent those would NOT be battlefields.
Homosexual this or that, genderism, abortion ... these are NOT neutral issues that are to be assumed normal in the moral spectrum as the left assumes they are and frames their rhetoric around the view that to oppose these makes you a bad person, a something-phobe or whatever.
The left frames it’s rhetoric as moral assumptions (though it is a very strange morality) which admit no contradiction rather than moral arguments and counter arguments. This is the fruit of critical theory that so many assert is a nothing muffin even though it lay behind much that they do. All too often there is a want of honesty, or even the awareness, to admit that they are pushing an agenda themselves.
Progressives are, to be frank, proverbial forest dwellers who somehow don’t believe in forests.
I don’t expect many progressives to understand since they ALSO seem unable to realize that the civilization war that is Islam vs everyone else has certain battlefields too...
bttt