The article reminds me of a picture in one of my WW II history books. It shows a ranger springing from cover, and in his right hand is an M-1 Garand. He is holding it back of the trigger guard, and parallel in front of him. Well, the Garand must be an assault rifle if a ranger is using it to attack the enemy. By the way, how many people, even for a moment, would be able to grasp a Garand by the pistol grip of the stock and raise it off the ground?
North eastern states, nothing further needs to be said. It mortifies me that my state of birth, Calif is stampeding after the Yankee bastions, trying to outdo them with stupidity and unconstitutional laws.
Liberals, including liberals who wear a badge, love to use “emotional” words which is all the term “assault rifle” is. It is meant to conjure up emotion and fear in the reader.
JoMa
but does the shoulder thing go up? because if it does, life in prison only seems reasonable.
Was he carrying a pointed stick?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I personally think my Hi-Point carbines are beautiful.
(stock photo)
It worked at Columbine.