Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the U.S. Preemptively Strike NK?And is a Diplomatic Solution Even Possible at this Point?
IWB ^ | Robert Carbery

Posted on 07/06/2017 2:29:40 PM PDT by davikkm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: davikkm

stupid speculation


41 posted on 07/06/2017 3:31:28 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

The location of an NK missile shoot down would be based on our current capabilities. I agree that doing so well away from the mainland is preferable. But I’m at least hopeful that we could do a close in shoot down from a ship. But I can’t name the system that would do it.

How far out to sea can that be extended? I really don’t know. Maybe somebody will pipe in who knows our deployed capability and the intercept range of our shipborn systems.


42 posted on 07/06/2017 3:31:30 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Yes. And maybe.


43 posted on 07/06/2017 3:32:28 PM PDT by Pelham (Liberate California. Deport Mexico Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

A rumor plant might do it. Hey. Jong mentally ill. You are about to have a revolt.


44 posted on 07/06/2017 3:33:32 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Just dreaming out loud.

There's probably a lot of stuff we could do, if we had worked hard on SDI for the last 30 years since Ronald first dreamed it.

I don't how much we've done, but I suspect not enough.

45 posted on 07/06/2017 3:33:37 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

It looks like AEGIS is the shipborne anti-ICBM system. Very mature system.


46 posted on 07/06/2017 3:35:17 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
But I can’t name the system that would do it.

The one that shot down TWA 800!

(I know, bad joke, but I couldn't resist.)

47 posted on 07/06/2017 3:36:44 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Perhaps what God hath wrought will prove sufficient.


48 posted on 07/06/2017 3:37:38 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

and it would work even better if we could stop running into container ships.


49 posted on 07/06/2017 3:39:17 PM PDT by Pelham (Liberate California. Deport Mexico Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

No, it is ours. Nuke em NOW. MacArthur told Truman the damn truth just like Patton told FDR and IKE.


50 posted on 07/06/2017 3:39:54 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

I wonder if South Korea would be willing to launch a lost-soldier offensive. I know. Suuure with the mush in charge now.


51 posted on 07/06/2017 3:40:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

It wouldn’t be the worst way to put them out of their misery.

The problem is that the generals aren’t the ones who have to fall on their political swords.


52 posted on 07/06/2017 3:43:13 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
AEGIS

If you do go that route, you have to be prepared for N. Korea to retaliate, and you don't know what they would do, so you lose control of the situation.

It may be better just to bite the bullet and strike them first on your terms.

53 posted on 07/06/2017 3:43:15 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Well we have a destructive madman in any case.

I pray the Lord would undermine him.


54 posted on 07/06/2017 3:46:30 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Tactically, I think the key capability that S. Korea is concerned with is our ability to take out the NK artillery before it can devastate Seoul.

I don't think we'd be this far into saber-rattling unless we and S. Korea thought we could do it.

55 posted on 07/06/2017 3:48:08 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Fear could have a way of stiffening Seoul’s spine. Let’s show that dear leader some “oppan” (older brother).


56 posted on 07/06/2017 3:51:33 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

And I like the BBQ idea. Leaflet the artillery installations with “surrender and we’ll feed you!”


57 posted on 07/06/2017 3:54:17 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
LOL! Get some Tokyo Rose type to broadcast how delicious it is.

"Sojah boy, mmmm."

58 posted on 07/06/2017 3:58:20 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG
What I really wish we had pursued is Project Thor, aka. Rods from God. We would have the equivalent of a nuclear first strike without the radiation and having to cross the nuke threshold.


59 posted on 07/06/2017 3:58:59 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism wiithout Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Nice!


60 posted on 07/06/2017 4:01:43 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson