Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New study: Clinton could have won presidency if burden of war was lower in key states
The Kansas City Star ^ | July 18, 2017 | Max Londberg

Posted on 07/19/2017 1:43:45 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: poconopundit

I’m sorry, but you will never convince me that the woman in that picture is the actual Hillary Clinton - PERIOD!

Conspiracy theory or not, THAT is NOT Killary!


81 posted on 07/19/2017 8:29:57 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Helping Make American Great Again, by ignoring Liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

Apparently, in 2017, this is no longer an acceptable analogy!


82 posted on 07/19/2017 8:33:38 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Helping Make American Great Again, by ignoring Liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There was massive voter fraud in Los Angeles county. Some 2 million illegal votes.


83 posted on 07/19/2017 11:04:08 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine; Liz

I totally agree with you. My remarks were sarcastic.

It’s one of those “little frauds” among so many massive frauds in Hillary’s history.

And I think it can be said, she spent more time covering her a** than actually campaigning.

She and WJC are the Bonnie and Clyde of government corruption. Let’s see what surprise ending Sessions and Trump has for them.


84 posted on 07/19/2017 1:18:28 PM PDT by poconopundit (CNN is... Corruption News Neglected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit

She has made some crucial mistakes only recently-——saying the DNC was broke during her campaign, and that she had to bail them out w/ her millions.

The Dems were enraged at her statements.....actually telling her to get off the stage.


85 posted on 07/19/2017 2:29:56 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Still trying to figure out why Clintons’ Wife lost. Forty years of a scorched earth policy and a trail of bodies for starters. Eight years of Pres. Obama secondly. Conservatives finally not able to take any more Thirdly.


86 posted on 07/19/2017 2:39:10 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998

It’s not just “conservatives” in this instance. It was working and middle class people who’ve been ignored, berated and shunned by the elites of both parties.

About Those Trump Supporters
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3570265/posts


87 posted on 07/19/2017 2:48:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Liz

As far as I can see, she’s still very much in control of the Dem party!

Her key guy was annointed DNC chairman. There were stories recently of Kamala Harris visiting the Clintons and getting their blessing on running.

And the murders keep on happening both in DW Schultz’s district, in Haiti and Chicago.

I wonder how much control the Clintons and Obama’s still have over the media through their threats and extortions.

Bernie’s wife is under investigation.

Seems like Jarrett and Huma are being quiet. Wonder what evil they’ve cooking up these days.


88 posted on 07/19/2017 3:43:15 PM PDT by poconopundit (CNN is... Corruption News Neglected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Public restrooms and Transgenders.


89 posted on 07/20/2017 2:48:57 PM PDT by Does so ("PARIS" is like OPEC, except We're Winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
This does not make my list. 1. There is no indication that the authors are Hillary surrogates. 2. The study is fatally flawed, but the error appears to be innocent or narrowly political (anti-war, rather than anti-Trump), rather than Trump-bashing. In fact, since supporting our military is a good surrogate for supporting America’s Constitution and America’s borders, the military deaths are really a measure of regional support for Trump’s campaign promises - a lurking variable. As much as I would enjoy adding this excuse to the mix, I don’t think it meets the criteria, so the old list stands

Good point. To say she could have won if she'd had a different policy on something or if people weren't concerned about something is different from saying that she was perfect and would have won if somebody or other hadn't interfered or gotten in the way.

The mathematical idea that if war casualties had been half what they were, she could have won is a little screwy, but it's not outrageous to say that there were antiwar votes in key states that Trump managed to tap into, contributing to his victory.

90 posted on 07/20/2017 2:57:51 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Higher World war 1 and 2 casualties in key swing states may have swung November’s presidential election away from Hillary Clinton, a new study suggests.

Possible Civil War 1. and the Revolutionary war 1 also.


91 posted on 07/20/2017 3:02:44 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Does so
Public restrooms and Transgenders.

Nope, not a chance. No Hillary supporter I am aware of has even considered the possibility that those contributed to her loss. My list has nothing to do with why people didn't vote for Hillary. It's limited to reasons that she and her advocates have advanced in public to explain how the most brilliant, most qualified, and most historic candidate in history could have lost.

92 posted on 07/20/2017 3:21:56 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson