Posted on 07/21/2017 10:44:50 AM PDT by davikkm
I know, right?
At first, the over the top rhetoric held my interest as to wonder why Sessions was against freedom.
Then, the little that’s been revealed showed that I don’t even need to check out the ‘whole story’.
Crack/crap-pots everywhere, so little time ......
You forgot thune d south dakota
Agreed.
Oh he is not. Silly
Tesseract..whoever, or whatever that is, is smoking the crack!?
Actually, Sessions is implementing Trump's agendas probably to the extend possible in the DOJ.
He's increasing immigration enforcement however he can. He's gone after MS-13 which was a Trump campaign promise (some here seem to have forgotten that while making fun of Sessions' going after gangs.)
And he is not pursuing Hillary and the Clintons since Trump himself said the Clintons have been through enough and he would not have them pursued. Another thing many have forgotten and are blaming on Sessions.
And do you know Trump's position of civil forfeiture? I agree with you on this, but what does Trump think?
“One of the main reasons that McCain, Graham, Flake, Rubio, Murkowsky, Alexander, Hoeven, Hatch, Heller, Corker and the rest of the Cheap Labor Express Republicans have not given the country away already is Jeff Sessions.”
Exactly. So it’s small wonder now that DACA is on the ropes the NeverTrump/Dem brigade are all about kicking Sessions to the curb.
In the Justice Department or anywhere at all, it seems.
His confirmation hearings were an epiphany to me, just because of all of the unfounded accusations and prejudice. It was pretty amazing.
Alexander, Corker, Flake, Gardner, Graham, Hatch, Heller, Hoeven, Murkowsky, McCain, Rubio, Burr, Tillis, Portman, McConnell, Thune, Cornyn, Cochran, Isackson, Blunt, Johnson, Toomey, Capito, Rounds, Fischer, Collins, Wicker, Sasse are all Cheap Labor Express Republicans.
I only listed the ones who voted for Rubio amnesty in the first post.
I am not aware of Trump addressing this issue.
I care about what the Constitution says and due process demands a conviction before punishment.
Why is it you seem to be such a blog pimp?
“I am not aware of Trump addressing this issue.”
He did. He’s a big fan.
“I am not aware of Trump addressing this issue.”
He did. He’s a big fan.
POST OF THE DAY—thank you, Lurkin!! Sessions was fighting before Trump came on the scene. No one could have foreseen this mess!
You deny the knee-jerk pothead reaction to any objection to their drug of choice?
“You deny the knee-jerk pothead reaction to any objection to their drug of choice?”
Been seeing this fallacy pushed a lot in FR the last couple of months.
You might want to lose it asap cuz’ it doesn’t validate anything but your confirmation bias against cannabis & cannabis users.
Check back and find any comment on this topic in which I name-called that way. You won' find any. I think the closest I came to that was suggesting that when heads toke themselves into befuddled unemployability that no public assistance be rendered to them. That won't happen. Like alcoholism, they'll call it a disease and pick my/our pocket to "help" people who don't want help but enablement.
If the shoe doesn't fit you personally, don't put it on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.