All This Talk of “Hackers” is Just Code for Something Far More Insidious

IWB ^ | Mark Angelides

[davikkm]

We have been fed a dangerous lie that will cut to the very heart of freedom in America (and elsewhere soon enough). When the politicians and the media talk about “hackers,” they are telling a flat out narrative that barely exists above a whisper in the real world. They have made these “hackers” into “demons working for dangerous nations” to make us fear what is an almost non-existent threat. The real reason they are spinning this tale is far more nefarious.

This whole effort is to shut down conservative voices and be lauded as heroes for it. Internet controls, censorship, lack of access, lack of privacy are all coming soon, and will be sold to us a way to “prevent hackers interfering with our democracy.” Don’t be fooled.

[Vendome]

Hackers is a BS term that way to frequently tossed around.

Most of the time they are inside jobs....

[Artemis Webb]

When I came on this thread I was going to complain about the use of the word “code” in this context. It drives me crazy when the left claims something we say is “code” for something else.

However, the premise of the author is correct. All of their actions are part of a larger effort to shut down dissenting conservative opinions.

[Darksheare]

IF hacking were a thing in this election, then what -if anything- are they doing to prevent it?
Absolutely nothing, that’s what.
(Democrats use skeevy tactics and software during the vote “tally” to alter outcomes. If the system were fixed to prevent shenanigans, they would be in trouble.)

[ctdonath2]

IF hacking were a thing in this election, they could & would point to irregularities that mattered to the outcome.
But they don’t, and can’t.

In contrast, there’s precincts that went 115% (D), undercover video points squarely at NH having been flipped deliberately & illegally away from Trump, and CA has a million highly suspect votes (didn’t affect the outcome - thanks to the EC).
Of course they’re not doing anything about it. The abuseable system works in their favor - they just didn’t expect “flyover country” would go SO far toward Trump.

[arthurus]

I have not thought of it in quite these terms but it is what I have been expecting for along time. It popped on a big light when Gab was just threatened about losing their domain. There was a reason Hussein gave the Domain registry to the UN.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

It’s been well known that the Chinese have been furiously hacking US sites since 1995.

What a huge sin; doing nothing about it, hey, that’s OK.

[JimRed]

The hackers who create computer viruses (probably as employees of the companies that sell anti-virus stuff) should be summarily executed beaten up by virus victims for a number of years, 3-5 times a day.

[YogicCowboy]

I was never fooled.

[SkyDancer]

My cat is a hacker. Does that count?

[Garth Tater]

" Internet controls, censorship, lack of access, lack of privacy are all coming soon"

The globalist NWO cabal made two mistakes on their march towards one world government - THEIR government.

First, they failed to get our guns. Bill Clinton's 1994 Assault Weapons Ban was their high-water mark. He was supposed to follow through with gun registration (using a mandated insurance requirement) but his zipper problems got in the way and that was not accomplished.

And then the internet came along. If they knew then what they know now they would have taken control of the net right from its start. But they didn't see its power and now we are free to educate ourselves and share our knowledge with other freedom loving Americans outside of their well controlled media and academic silos. More and more eyes are opening up every day to their plan.

They are going to attempt to get this internet thing back under their control, they have to, it's just a matter of how they're going to go about it.