Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
The reason why the states went with popular vote for Senators? Because people were paying way too much attention to statehouse members and the Senators they voted in! The rule of thumb for any legislature is to evade responsibility in order to stay in office. That's why such bodies are happy to pass their powers to somebody else, it helps them hold their comfy seat longer.

The ploy worked. For me, until the Convention of States movement came along, I cared little who my state rep was. They have little say now in how we are actually governed. Power in the District of Corruption is nearly total.

2 posted on 10/09/2017 2:01:45 AM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nateman

The convention considered election by the House of Reps, by the people, and by the state legislatures. Suggested terms ran the gamut from three years to life. Fascinating stuff.

Yes, people would pay more attention to state elections if state legislators were once again responsible for appointing senators. I believe repeal of the 17A would enhance, somewhat, the quality of state legislators.


3 posted on 10/09/2017 2:50:40 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson