WHY DID HILLARY LOSE?
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
This guy’s tears are delicious.
Happy Friday everyone.
insanity is correct...I am not talking about this post in any manner whatsoever....but why are other people so enthralled with this egocentric, narcissistic wicked witch of a woman...I mean what is the attraction?....for ‘us”?....i get it...watching a long overdue train wreck....but for the general public?
When does the rehashing of this election end?
Listen to the SHRUMBEAT !!
And the beat goes on ! (Being/picking losers that is)
Old Bob Shrum. Ignorant until the bitter end. Good.
Let's see Clintons give the North Korean's Nuclear technology and our tax dollars to support it. They develop nukes and threaten to KILL US. and SOMEHOW it's Trump's fault?????
Boo Hoo, Bob. I am grateful every day that this shrew isn’t President. When Trump can purge all the leaker leftovers from the Obama Admin (AND the Repubs still in place that are never Trump-ers), I will be even more grateful that our security and the security of our Military serving across the Globe, will again be of utmost importance.
Where is the BARF ALERT!!
No one better to ask the question of “how did she lose” than Mr. 0 for 8 Bob Shrum.
The earth is still flat for this type.
So many reasons/excuses for her loss.
Hillary was unpopular. Hillary is not the politician her husband is. Hillary is unlikeable. Hillary is polarizing. People didn’t want to see the Clintons back in the White House. The idea that we would see the historic first woman president didn’t resonate with people. It’s telling that two big groups of women, white women, and married women, supported Trump. In this era of identity politics, Hillary should have had a base of support among white women, and she lost that group of voters.
Hillary was just a bad candidate. To think that you nominate a polarizing candidate such as Hillary, and think that you will sweep to your coronation, was absurd in retrospect.
Try the Catholic vote which she lost badly for a Democrat. She actually had no chance of winning once she lost Catholics but since Catholics are a target group except for the welfare cheese fake ones, Catholics were never included in proper numbers when surveys were taken.
It’s funny watching even the Hillary lovers read through her fake “human-nes”. He basically says, she is a irreverent sociopath and devoid of any rational association with the real world, but she makes some good points and still should have been President.
I think it was several things.
The Clinton name comes with a lot of baggage. People don’t like baggage.
Clinton was a sub-par Senator and a failed Sec of State. Why promote that to President?
People were voting against career politicians and for an outsider.
MSM Polls were attempting to be persuasive rather than predictive. They skewed upwards with Clinton and downward with Trump attempting to encourage the left and discourage the right. It backfired. I think the left stayed home because they felt it was in the bag, and the right came out strong trying to flip the numbers.
“Deplorables” was the worst thing Clinton could have said. It peaved off and emboldened the right to get out and vote.
The private server emails just looked bad from the get go. She tried to brush it off and made her look even worse.
It was simply a perfect storm of her own making.
What an absolutely horrible article. And that is all I have to say...about that.
JoMa
shrum is an expert on losing.
She lost because she sided with fraudulently documented foreigners against the citizens and the rule of law.
We are sick of the invasion of our country and the government encouraging it.
And every sentence is a lie. But he “believes” his own lies!