I don’t get it.
Was he criticizing the play or the production?..............
i don’t know but he destroys the narrative of BLM...he claims in the 1st six months of this year 492 people were shot by cops and 242 were black...
The play FERGUSON is simply an exact reading of the grand jury transcript. It exposes all the lies of hands up don’t shoot. My guess is that he took this gig so he could pull off this protest.
I think the actor was criticizing the play for not being more supportive of the accepted Michael Brown ‘The Victim of Oppression’ narrative.
If this conflict was real, the playwright, an up in age white man took a risk arguing on a darkened street with the actor.
Things could easily have gotten violent.
In a different play, this would make an interesting ending to the performance. Break character, and have an open ended debate with no clear winner. It sounds very much like something Michael Moore would do, except we all know any staged argument would finish in agreement with his personal views.
He was promoting his own “alternative facts”.
"I’m tired of these activists spouting talking points," said McAleer. "If they think my play FERGUSON misrepresents the Grand Jury testimony - they need to create their own play, but they never do because any reasonable fair reading of the transcripts show that Darren Wilson was justified in shooting Michael Brown who was on a crime spree that day."
Sounds like the playright based it entirely on grand jury testimony. Therefore Michael Brown ends up looking like the thug he is.