To: w1n1
LOL, look at that barrel bouncing up and down. This thing is completely inaccurate and good only for a wide spray of suppressing fire. What practical application would it have that a rifle or shotgun wouldn’t be better at.
To: circlecity
LOL, look at that barrel bouncing up and down. This thing is completely inaccurate and good only for a wide spray of suppressing fire.Amen. Think about Las Vegas. Paddock is accused of using a bump stock to get a "machine gun" effect to his firing. No way he could fire accurately with the constant recoil. Of course, his victims, at least initially, were so tightly packed together that aiming wasn't really necessary.
In a situation where there are multiple assailants after your ass, a gun like this might be useful. But in most defensive situations, I doubt it.
3 posted on
11/30/2017 5:19:11 AM PST by
upchuck
("Ex-obama" ... That phrase itself honors America. ~ h/t glennaro)
To: circlecity
What practical application would it have that a rifle or shotgun wouldn’t be better at. You can carry it in a holster?
4 posted on
11/30/2017 6:01:23 AM PST by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
To: circlecity
What practical application would it have that a rifle or shotgun wouldn’t be better at.Tightly packed rioters, for one. Where individual targeting is superfluous.
9 posted on
11/30/2017 6:46:45 AM PST by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: circlecity
"What practical application would it have that a rifle or shotgun wouldn’t be better at." Attending the demoncrat national convention? Riots are popular there...
13 posted on
11/30/2017 12:33:25 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson