Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Senate of the States - The 17th Amendment
Article V Blog ^ | December 21st 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 12/21/2017 12:54:36 AM PST by Jacquerie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Impy

The Senate was not a mess as it is today. And the States had a lot of power whereas today they have none.

The local state legislator is a neighbor who can’t run and hide. The US Senator can hide and send you weasel words. You have ZERO power over a US Senator unless you’re a one percenter.

As for people repealing the 17th, they will do so when they are offered to trade a vote to elect for a vote to recall; a power to fire rather than hire. Recall empowers, places people on the preferred board, rather than as common shareholders. Recall is much, much more powerful.


21 posted on 12/21/2017 8:45:25 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Yes, duly noted in footnote #1.


22 posted on 12/21/2017 8:48:47 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Territories are not states. It is called the United States Senate, not the United Territories Senate. Territories under U.S. rule do not get to vote in EITHER house of congress, because they are not states. Only states may have congressman or senators.

You had a rough time in school, huh?

23 posted on 12/21/2017 8:50:19 AM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; Impy; fieldmarshaldj
>> The local state legislator is a neighbor who can’t run and hide. <<

That's odd, last time I checked, my state senator is a Chicago DemocRAT who was gerrymandered into a mostly suburban district. The 20% of the district in the city is in an ultra Democrat turf that votes 95% D so they get to dictate who "represents" the rest of us, regardless of how the REST of the district votes.

He had no problem "running and hiding" from his constituents when he made some statement about shutting down home schooling in this state and we tried to melt down the phone lines in his Springfield office. Very rarely does he EVER meet with "his" constituents in the suburbs. He's a loyal Mike Madigan puppet and pretty much rubber stamps whatever the Illinois House Speaker tells him to, despite being a member of the other house.

Sorry reality doesn't gel with your talking points.

24 posted on 12/21/2017 8:55:26 AM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; Impy; fieldmarshaldj
>> Recall is much, much more powerful. <<

Ironic. You realize Recall was started during the SAME "progressive era" from 1913-1917 that the 16th and 17th amendment came out of, right? Yep, the SAME era you're claiming that ANYTHING created during that time period is AUTOMATICALLY evil because Woodrow Wilson was President.

The framers of the U.S. constitution considered the possibility of allowing Recall of federal and state officials, but REJECTED it. They strongly felt politicians should only be removed by impeachment, so that is what became the law of the land in 1787.

In the early 20th century, the Progressive Movement, especially in western states, sought more direct democracy by promoting the enactment of Recall laws. California lead the effort in 1912, a product of "progressive leader" Hiram Johnson's campaign promise. By 1920, about a dozen states had successfully enactment such provisions. North Dakota (also under "progressive" rule at the time) was the first state to successfully recall a statewide official, in 1921.

25 posted on 12/21/2017 9:08:58 AM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
It seems to me that in a pre-17th Senate, the means of "firing" a Senator was to decline to reappoint. It's true that a state would be stuck with a corrupt Senator for six years unless he was pressured to resign or was expelled.

The state legislatures would have paid closer attention to the performance of their Senators than the general public, because the public is distracted by their daily lives, and the Senators' behavior reflected on those in the legislature who voted for him.

A legislature that reappointed a corrupt Senator would not last long in their own seats when going back to their own neighbors for reelection.

Or so seems the argument.

-PJ

26 posted on 12/21/2017 11:25:22 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: central_va; Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; NFHale

Anyone who seriously believes that you’d have CONSERVATIVES as a result of those GOP legislatures is misinformed. In Texas alone, they can’t get rid of a left-wing RINO House Speaker who maintains power via a coalition of Democrats and weak-kneed RINO pantywaists. Here in TN, despite a similar 2/3rds+ GOP majority, we also have a RINO House Speaker and have yet to elect a Conservative to the post.

You’d have similar “coalitions” electing left-wing, treasury-looting cretins and reprobates to the Senate just like these Speakers.


27 posted on 12/21/2017 1:18:00 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pecos; nicollo; Kalam; IYAS9YAS; laplata; mvonfr; Southside_Chicago_Republican; celmak; ...

The 16th and 17th amendments were a gift to us from Theodore Roosevelt (and a continuation of his wishes through Taft), not Woodrow Wilson.


28 posted on 12/22/2017 4:24:51 PM PST by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

29 posted on 12/22/2017 5:59:25 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

...and don’t forget the Federal Reserve, all products of the worst year in American history, 1913.


30 posted on 12/22/2017 7:23:15 PM PST by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Thank you for the correct info. Many people/conservatives don’t realize how Progressive TR was.


31 posted on 12/22/2017 7:54:33 PM PST by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

We reflexively call the government “federal,” when it hasn’t been so since 1913. It is very close to the National government idea that was roundly defeated at the Philadelphia convention.


32 posted on 12/23/2017 12:45:58 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson