To: Starman417
I still don't understand at all how the sale of customized goods and services like a wedding cake or or a wedding photography package can be subject to public accomodation laws. If the customer doesn't like the off the shelf product, they can go elsewhere. It is pure totalitarianism for the government to force a business to sell something it doesn't provide.
7 posted on
01/02/2018 4:51:22 PM PST by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: Menehune56
9 posted on
01/02/2018 5:00:17 PM PST by
Billyv
(Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
To: Menehune56
I still don't understand at all how the sale of customized goods and services like a wedding cake or or a wedding photography package can be subject to public accomodation laws.
Me too.
OTOH some obvious alternatives seem to exist in this situation, like telling the faggits "sure, I'll bake your cake, but you'll forever wonder WHAT I DID to it." Then, of course, if they still want it, I'd document the fact that I did nothing.
10 posted on
01/02/2018 5:01:04 PM PST by
867V309
(Lock Her Up)
To: Menehune56
The court(s) didn’t legalize same-sex “marriage” to advance freedom, but to use it as a battering ram against freedom.
14 posted on
01/02/2018 6:36:00 PM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
To: Menehune56
That is a good distinction. Often the answer to a dilemma like this is to go in with a scalpel, not a bulldozer. Very intelligent point. Hope the Court is listening.
To: Menehune56
18 posted on
01/02/2018 11:36:03 PM PST by
RetAF_fedUP
(2,623 Trump 489 Clinton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson