Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Michael Wolff the set up to smoke out leakers?
Flopping Aces ^ | 01-07-18 | DrJohn

Posted on 01/08/2018 9:39:41 AM PST by Starman417

Despite what the radical left wing press asserts, Donald Trump is not mentally impaired, nor is he naive or stupid. He would not allow an author with a highly dubious record

But Wolff has also been taken to task for blurring the lines between hot take and hatchet job. “Wolff exploits the human tendency to confuse frankness and cruelty with truth-telling,” media critic Jack Shafer wrote in Slate in 1998. “And by repeatedly reminding the reader of what a dishonest, scheming little s- he is, he seeks to inflate his credibility.”

As The Post’s Paul Farhi wrote this week, credibility has been a repeated issue. Wolff’s first best-seller, “Burn Rate: How I Survived the Gold Rush Years on the Internet,” came under fire after Brill’s Content found a dozen individuals who disputed their quotes in the book. While later penning a regular column for New York magazine, book editor Judith Regan called foul on a column Wolff wrote about her, as did Andrew Sullivan. Both disputed Wolff’s portrayals of them.

into the White House without a plan.

And there's plenty more. The book is riddled with errors. So why would Donald Trump allow such a chucklehead access to the White House?

The answer may lie in the relentless leaking that was occurring in the Trump campaign right from the start. Trump values loyalty and he may have decided upon a way to determine where that loyalty was and where it lacked. Michael Wolff was allowed access to the Trump campaign around the middle of 2016. Chris Wallace reported that the White House Communications Team urged all senior advisers to talk with Wolff. Trump and his truly trusted staff could easily have fed stories to different people and then use those stories as tracers. Trump may have wanted to test the loyalty of all, so he went fishing.

The biggest fish caught in the betrayal net was Steve Bannon. He had a number of unsavory things to say about Trump, his family and staff. Trump wasted no time returning the fire. Bannon stayed silent for a few days, but then, realizing that he pretty much destroyed his career, offered up a mea culpa:

It's too late for Bannon. He's done. As for Wolff, his explained his motivation:

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bannon; breitbart; fireandfury; leakers; mediawingofthednc; michaelwolff; partisanmediashills; stevebannon; trump; wikileaks; wolff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2018 9:39:42 AM PST by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Yes, have some.


2 posted on 01/08/2018 9:43:45 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

‘So why would Donald Trump allow such a chucklehead access to the White House?’

The stupidness of these theories is wearing thin. It was Bannon who gave Wolff access. Not Trump—Bannon.


3 posted on 01/08/2018 9:47:52 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
It was Bannon who gave Wolff access. Not Trump—Bannon.

Which tells me something about Bannon, something I don't care for.

4 posted on 01/08/2018 9:52:09 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

That... um... dude(?) is way creepier looking than Adam Schiff!


5 posted on 01/08/2018 9:52:14 AM PST by ObozoMustGo2012 ("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

yeah...they should form a club...a rock group or something. The Creepies!


6 posted on 01/08/2018 10:01:25 AM PST by gr8eman (Facts and evidence are bourgeois constructs weaponized by patriarchal penis-people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
The stupidness of these theories is wearing thin. It was Bannon who gave Wolff access. Not Trump—Bannon.

Trump's mistake was in giving Bannon access. As much as Trump supporters might like to believe this was all part of a Machiavellian plot to out leakers, it was not.

7 posted on 01/08/2018 10:08:19 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Bannon said many things. The thing he never said was sorry for causing all this trouble


8 posted on 01/08/2018 10:09:20 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

It tells me exactly the same thing. Notice that after Bannon and Priebus were ousted, the WH leaks stopped. Before that it was chaos.

It’s a miracle of God that Trump had such a good first year—he was being undermined from both outside and *inside* the WH. The coming year should be significantly better, or so we hope.


9 posted on 01/08/2018 10:11:28 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

I have read in multiple sources that it was the Mercers who recommended Bannon. Both the Mercers and Bannon were big Cruz supporters. Perhaps that should have been a red flag.


10 posted on 01/08/2018 10:13:55 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Bannon looks like he might coach the Patriots (New England, that is).


11 posted on 01/08/2018 10:16:21 AM PST by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Wolff it was Bannon and Kellyanne. But apparently there was no objection from Trump, who called Wolff some positive superlatives.


12 posted on 01/08/2018 10:18:58 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

‘Wolff it was Bannon and Kellyanne.’

Just shy of coherence.

‘But apparently there was no objection from Trump, who called Wolff some positive superlatives.’

Link, please.


13 posted on 01/08/2018 10:22:09 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

The Creepies were Kesha’s backup band. They had a “F the world” tour in 2016, so these guys would probably fit right in.


14 posted on 01/08/2018 10:32:37 AM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
The stupidness of these theories is wearing thin.

Amen to that. Occam’s Razor comes to mind.

15 posted on 01/08/2018 10:41:05 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

+1


16 posted on 01/08/2018 10:47:03 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

‘But apparently there was no objection from Trump, who called Wolff some positive superlatives.’

Your Trump-hate has finally taken you too far. Trump says he never spoke to Wolff. The crazed, pathologically dishonest Wolff claims Trump spoke to him, ‘without knowing it.’ Not even the Leftists are buying that load of BS...but you are. You not only believe that Trump spoke to Wolff without knowing it, you believe he called this unknown person “some positive superlatives,” while he was at it.

Joe, you’re going off the rails. It’s time to make a major course correction before it’s too late.


17 posted on 01/08/2018 11:03:39 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Oh for God’s sake, if they didn’t know that the whole West Wing leaks like a sieve before Wolff then they’ll never come to that realization.


18 posted on 01/08/2018 11:05:15 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

He probably looks a lot better when he’s in full makeup, wearing a nice sequined dress.


19 posted on 01/08/2018 11:24:15 AM PST by Salamander (And Ezekiel Smiles Again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

[He probably looks a lot better when he’s in full makeup, wearing a nice sequined dress.]

You mean his usual Saturday night get-up?


20 posted on 01/08/2018 11:43:57 AM PST by ObozoMustGo2012 ("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson