Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
“Noting that, “[i]t should go without saying that neither Judge Sullivan, nor any District Judge, should have to order the Government to comply with its constitutional obligations, let alone that he should feel compelled to craft such an order with a view toward a criminal contempt prosecution, anticipating its willful violation,” Mr. Schuelke nevertheless recommended that, without disobedience of a “clear and unequivocal” order, the prosecutors not be charged with criminal contempt.”

Nonsense. Was this investigator named Comey ? This mealymouthed rationale sounds eerily similar to his excuse for not charging Clinton.

14 posted on 02/21/2018 12:26:08 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward
Nonsense.
Now you know what put the bee in Judge Sullivan’s bonnet about issuing the prosecutor an explicit Brady warning from the bench at the first opportunity.

Again, why doesn’t Jeff Sessions institute a Brady warning requirement for any Special Persecutor? And why does any criminal defense attorney anywhere pass up the opportunity to pressure the judge to issue one at the start of every trial?


15 posted on 02/21/2018 1:48:27 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson