My favorite:
Posted on 05/24/2018 9:14:07 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
This is the latest update on the Democrat civil war.
First let’s welcome Fox News to “frontline” reporting on the Democrat civil war. Those of us that have been watching this circus unfold are happy to see other people “get it.”
The media’s insistence upon ignoring the new generic poll lead for Republicans and Donald Trump’s consistently high approval ratings cannot hide the fact that the Democrat party is imploding by the week.
This week another round of Democrat primaries spilled a few more gallons of Insane Democrat blood. For those just joining us, The Insane Democrats, are the ones who want to lie and hide their real agenda as they always do. They are in a civil war fight to the death with The Crazy Democrats who want to be out front about their agenda to destroy America.
The Crazies will only back candidates who say out loud they will repeal the Second Amendment and confiscate our guns, repeal Trump’s tax cuts; grant total amnesty to the world, and impeach Trump. The Crazies will not vote in November and this is the terrible bind The Insanes are in.
Tuesday’s Democrat primaries brought victories to The Crazies in two governor’s races. In Texas they nominated a far left wing lesbian and in Georgia they nominated another far left wing female. Neither has the slightest chance of winning in November but The Crazies couldn’t care less. They want what they want – period!
In the Democrat primary to face Republican Karen Handel (6th CD Ga)there will be a runoff between The Crazy candidate and The Insane candidate. The probable outcome will be a Crazy victory as they always out vote The Insanes in primaries.
In Kentucky’s 6th CD a Crazy won and will run against an incumbent Republican who won in 2016 by more than 20 points; but The Crazies could not care less. They want what they want – period!
The Insanes did however, take three primaries in Texas; one of which they had a prayer of winning in the general election in November before the plummeting generic numbers showing Democrat support is now in a free fall and two others they have little chance of winning.
When these results are juxtaposed with the terrible fundraising numbers just reported by the DNC the picture is bleak for The Insanes. Clearly The Crazies are not contributing to the DNC because they don’t want to support The Insane wing’s candidates. They are sending their money to their own candidates.
Who on our side is not happy to see this?
>>In the Democrat primary to face Republican Karen Handel (6th CD Ga)there will be a runoff between The Crazy candidate and The Insane candidate. The probable outcome will be a Crazy victory as they always out vote The Insanes in primaries.
Remember that this is the seat the Rats spent tens of millions of dollars trying to win just jast year. Handel against the ‘Crazy’ pajama-boi Ossoff.
While I appreciate a good political show, we need to be more reserved in our judgment and namecalling. The Dems were wholly convinced that Trump never stood a chance, but they were all struck dumb on election night when Trump steamrolled them.
While the general wisdom is that we’re going to persevere, I prefer not to count the proverbial chickens out of fear we’re left wiping egg from our brows on election night.
Remember, the Democrats have perfected the art of election tampering, and they’re all too eager to exercise it, consequences be damned. The sad truth is that election results are seldom overturned, and if it came out that widespread election tampering gave us a Democrat majority in either chamber, the chances of evicting those who were illegally put into those seats (in a reasonable amount of time) would be very slim.
I believe that the author meant to say that:
In November, the Crazies will only vote for a Crazy. If the Dems succeed in nominating an Insane, then the Crazies will stay home.
By the author's definition, Ossoff would be categorized as an 'insane' not a 'crazy'.
Listening to pajama-boi's commercials, he sounded like a republican, hiding his true colors.
My hope is that Stacey Abrams drags down the entire dem ticket in November.
Just an unpleasant reminder. There are plenty of ‘crazy conservatives’, the kind that insisted upon nominating un-electable candidates. Most notably and most recently Judge Roy Moore. We past up a chance to defeat Harry Ried. We nominated “I’m not a witch”, Christine O’Donnell. Etc., Etc.
I can’t count the times I’ve been told: “I want to vote for someone who reflects my views.” Or, my favorite,: “A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil”.
There is a Bible verse somewhere that explains all this.
Now the race is on and here comes Insanes up the backstretch
Crazies are going to the inside
My Laughs aren’t holding back they’re tryin’ not to fall
Logic is out of the running responsibility scratched for partisan’s sake
The race is on and it looks like Crazies and the winner rat loses all.
“I can’t count the times I’ve been told: “I want to vote for someone who reflects my views.” Or, my favorite,: “A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil”.
Two things come to mind here:
1) Patton’s dictum that “The Perfect is the enemy of the Good.”
and
2) William Buckley’s formula to determine for whom to vote:. The most conservative person who can win a particular election.
Thankfully, the Crazies don’t follow either.
I read that Diane Feinstein is moving to the left in her positions. I don’t consider her a crazy so I think that the leftward move by Democrats has some logical basis.
That’s superannuated Dianne Feinstein to you, buck-o.
Turns 85 on June 22, wants another six year term in office. Next time around, she’ll be 91, if my mental math is correct. Do we classify her as part of the “Insanes” or “Crazies”?
Just an unpleasant reminder. There are plenty of ‘crazy conservatives’, the kind that insisted upon nominating un-electable candidates. Most notably and most recently Judge Roy Moore. We past up a chance to defeat Harry Ried. We nominated “I’m not a witch”, Christine O’Donnell. Etc., Etc.
President Trump fits your definition of “crazy republican”. We were told, over and over, by many Republicans, that he could not win.
My favorite:
Beetlebaum?
bookmark
“That’s superannuated Dianne Feinstein to you, buck-o.”
Just because she’s 85 doesn’t mean she’s becoming addled. Do you have other evidence?
Very good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.