Both are unstable and lead to busts.
I'd rather see slow and steady which leads to long-term stability.
If people rush there because of the hype and the bottom falls out what's left behind is government dependent unemployed and houses left to decay by banks.
Look at the chart at the link. The bust has happened before and this article seems to be hyping the current trend (which as I said, is never a good model for stable growth).
That’s pretty much standard cycles, for Houston. Has been for decades.