Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A couple of things you might not know about the FBI conspiracy against Trump
Flopping Aces ^ | 06-26-18 | DrJohn

Posted on 06/27/2018 3:47:52 PM PDT by Starman417

The single most damning text between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page reads like this:

“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok.

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.

If that doesn't scream bias and conspiracy, nothing does. But you probably know these two. There are a few more you might not know. There might be a few more things you might not know.  The Trump Russia investigation was basically a seamless continuation of the Hillary email investigation.

Among the people who worked on the Clinton email investigation, er, "matter" were Agent 2 and Agent 5- Kevin Clinesmith and Sally Moyer. About Moyer:

About Clinesmith:

 Clinesmith lamented Clinton’s loss the day after the election, messaging to several FBI employees, “I am numb.” He added, “I am so stressed about what I could have done differently.”

Clinesmith also expressed regret over the reopening of the Clinton email case on Oct. 28, 2016, arguing that it “broke the momentum” of Clinton’s campaign. He warned at the time that the belated move, which was pressured by leaks over the discovery of additional classified emails on the laptop of Clinton’s aide in New York, could initiate “the destruction of the republic.”

After Clinesmith messaged another FBI employee that he was “just devastated” over Trump’s unexpected victory, he launched into a rant: “I just can’t imagine the systematic disassembly of the progress we made over the last 8 years. ACA is gone. Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and crap is true. I honestly feel like there is going to be a lot more gun issues, too, the crazies won finally. This is the tea party on steroids. And the GOP is going to be lost, they have to deal with an incumbent in 4 years. We have to fight this again. Also Pence is stupid.”

Then Clinesmith soon sent another text:
“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” read another message that apparently referenced the Clinton email investigation.

Asked in one text message after the election if he had changed his mind about Trump, Clinesmith wrote: “Hell no. Viva le resistance.”

Hillary was interviewed by an interesting group of people and had some other curious characters present as well:

Peter Strzok. David Laufman. What did they conclude?

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1010943653563518979

No kidding. Clinton was never even a subject. Clinton was never going to be in trouble

On Thursday night, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) released seven pages of textsbetween FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzock and his FBI paramour, Lisa Page. Those texts show that both Strzok and Page were interested in letting Hillary Clinton off the hook so as to earn the FBI goodwill with the presumed next president.

Page wrote to Strzok on February 25, 2016, “One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?” The obvious implication here is that Page wanted to go easy on Clinton in order to curry favor. Strzok wrote back, “Agreed. I called [FBI counterintelligence head] Bill [Priestap] and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. I will email you and [redacted] same.”

It was bizarre (and a departure from usual FBI protocol) that Clinton's lawyers were present. There was one more whose name was redacted. Her name is Jeannie Rhee. More on her in a moment.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: cherylmills; davidlaufman; fbi; heathersamuelson; jeannierhee; katherineturner; peterstrzok; trump

1 posted on 06/27/2018 3:47:52 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Corporate Law

ping


2 posted on 06/27/2018 3:49:44 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
FBImwith_Her_edited-1
3 posted on 06/27/2018 3:51:29 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I keep seeing this quote, but where’s the evidence of an actual plan?

Maybe he was just talking big to impress his girlfriend. None of these people ever believed Trump had a chance.


4 posted on 06/27/2018 3:59:39 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Hmmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Neither the President or Mrs. Clinton had won the respective nominations of their Partys, and the Primary Season was still undecided when this crap play began. So clever! No one ever seems to line these events into the timeline as should be done, just as no one seems to remember the huge deportation of Russian "diplomats" immediately after the election, something that always failed the smell test.

The fact is that the collusion narrative being mostly a cover-up has been obvious since before the Electoral College ballots were counted on the House Floor in December 2016.

5 posted on 06/27/2018 4:06:05 PM PDT by Prospero (Lex est rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

Ping for later.


6 posted on 06/27/2018 4:13:26 PM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Maybe he was just talking big to impress his girlfriend.

You are probably right sax, he likely voted for Trump and is just trying to cover that up amongst his friends. </s>

7 posted on 06/27/2018 4:19:20 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Man up little Peter the adulterer and secretly you tried to also destroy a President. Be a man and at least say you neither abide by any laws. ADULTRY is a li ack of candor proving your FBI is no longer capable of law enforcement.


8 posted on 06/27/2018 4:47:31 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

If he wasn’t an FBI agent talking to another FBI agent I might give him the benefit of the doubt.


9 posted on 06/27/2018 5:25:54 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
"....arguing that it “broke the momentum” of Clinton’s campaign."

Are you kidding me? Is it possible that these people don't know about forums like this? Is it possible that they do not know how to scroll through all the Disqus comments enabled on various sites, where Clinton is excoriated for her decades of evil deeds?

No, it was not the reopening of the email investigation that made us 'reconsider' voting for her. We've known what kind of person she is for DECADES! Shaaaaaaaaaa!
10 posted on 06/27/2018 5:36:59 PM PDT by softengine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

btt


11 posted on 06/27/2018 5:39:22 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I’ve always been curious where the figure of 30,000 emails came from. We’ve all heard it and parroted it like it’s the truth.

Here’s a quote from the article: “The FBI ignored the Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop- not 100,000, not 200,000, but 700,000 of them.”


12 posted on 06/27/2018 9:34:56 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

plotting against the election. Coup d’tats are treason

where is Sessions? What is trump going to do? Why aren’t they lining up the indictments? They have known about those for a few months now.


13 posted on 06/27/2018 9:37:35 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Where We Go One, We Go All.


14 posted on 06/27/2018 9:42:34 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
I'd like someone to ask "who's "we""?

and then "how would you stop him?..

15 posted on 06/27/2018 9:49:27 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
but where’s the evidence of an actual plan?

WTF does that mean?

16 posted on 06/27/2018 10:10:44 PM PDT by gogeo (No justice, no peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

One of the released texts said to the effect, “The White House wants us to keep them in the loop.”

Bias isn’t a felony or high crime.

We’ve lost track that the whole thing was an attempted coup led by Obama.


17 posted on 06/28/2018 1:20:26 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson