A pre-existing right the feds have unconstitutionally trampled on. Time to reinstate the Constitution AS WRITTEN AND ORIGINALLY UNDERSTOOD AND INTENDED as the Supreme Law of the Land over the feds and use it to slap the feds down!!!
States imposing abortion at the state level violates the First Amendment just as much as Roe v. Wade does.
Never mind the Guarantee Clause that was supposed to prevent the states from implementing socialist rather than republican forms of government.
Where is the “states right to chose abortion”?
It is in the same place as states rights to ban abortion - among those rights NOT named and enumerated in the Constitution as belonging to the federal government, amd because of that are instead reserved to the states and the people.
What are the blue and purple? Kind of a mixed bag—MA and Alabama.
They're too busy trying to do that with the "sanctuary states" issue.
Shirley you jest? When Marx advocates centralism, how can they?
Why can’t progressives just live and let live with the wonders of Federalism?
States have no rights to kill humans without due process. Zero!!
The way I see it is, there are already laws against murder. People should not be able to murder their babies. Sad state of things.
Constitution, 10th Amendment:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Congress creates and funds the lower courts. All Congress needs to do is order them not to hear state challenges to Roe v Wade. Done.
Why would it make any sense to allow this state or that state to decide who is a human being worthy of protection from murder?
As soon as the Supreme Court Justices can show us where in the Constitution the killing of unborn children is specified as a right, we will talk about it.
No doubt the Founders would be horrified to know that Justice Kennedy is being honored in spite of making up this “right” that has led to the death of nearly 60 million American children.
A very Liberal friend of mine did not get the sarcistic nature of a FB post I made.
My FB post was news article about a woman and her husband/boyfriend (I don’t remember which) and their desire to abort their child ev en though the woman was 30 weeks pregnant. To solve theur ptoblem the woman agreed to have her mate brutally punch her in the abdoman until she could no longer feel the baby move. The baby was delivered in the hospital will imuries so sever it died quickly after delivery.
My comment asked if the incident is raally muuder cause wasn’t it just a worhless bunch of tissue?
My Liberal friend did not get the sarcasm. She asked: I guess you really don’t know fetal development do you. Imagine her, with her rabid pro-choice stance, asking me that question when she knows I am pro-life and have posted many FB posts supporting that position.
Starting with Lincoln, the Federal Government has disregarded the Tenth Amendment to the point that most aren't even aware of it's content - certainly NOT the dems who have a reading level and intellect below first grade level.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."