Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Admits to Spending $10,000, a Piece on TOILET SEAT COVERS for a Cargo Plane
IWB ^ | Thinker

Posted on 07/17/2018 10:18:01 AM PDT by davikkm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: DesertRhino

“Bullcrap. That part could easily be made by almost any automotive upholstery shop for peanuts, and it would be just as good.”

And who is going to do the paperwork that certifies it to fly? Oh you don’t know about that paperwork do you? Then stop talking about what you don’t understand.


41 posted on 07/17/2018 12:18:34 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

“A toilet seat cover (unlike any number of other parts that sometimes came into controversy) shouldn’t require anything sophisticated, but if one has to retool to produce one or three or five parts, it still gets expensive. I don’t know how 3-D printing changes the equation”

I will tell you because I have done work on the C-5 semi-recently and I know the state of those design drawings. (I can tell you know a lot of this but I am speaking to the thread at large.

They have to pull it from ancient paper drawings.
Someone has to turn those into a 3D model.
Someone has to check that model. (peer review)
They have to make a prototype.
They have to fully test that prototype to be sure remaking it with modern materials and techniques will not cause it to be brittle or vibrate badly or any number of things.
They have to do a stack of paper work so the military knows they are getting workmanship that they contractually require including things like flame resistance.
They have to archive and version control all the new drawings and everything else.
They aren’t charging 10k for a part. They are paying 10k for the time and labor of a lot of professionals.

All this is REQUIRED by the military. Contractors don’t just make this stuff up. Other countries just have joe-shmo down the street slap stuff in their planes and guess what, those planes randomly fall out of the sky.


42 posted on 07/17/2018 12:25:15 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

“The Process is Stupid Unfair and my $ is on “The supplier of the $10,000 Cover Lost $””

I would bet a fat stack you are right.


43 posted on 07/17/2018 12:26:03 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

Good point! I bet you’re right on the supplier losing $.


44 posted on 07/17/2018 12:27:57 PM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Doesn’t matter.

The senator previously nailed the Air Force on hugely expensive toilet seats they wanted to buy.


45 posted on 07/17/2018 12:32:13 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Exactly, and thanks for elaborating. In a prior life, during the Reagan defense buildup, I got walked through a great many of these situations. The propensity of the left to misrepresent a factual situation is nothing new. Leftists lie. But you already knew that.

I'm working from ancient memory, but my favorite example used to be the cost for a wheel strut for an aircraft for which production had been discontinued 20 years earlier. This became a notorious red herring for the Ted Kennedy professional liar types, but no matter how many times you explained it to reporters, they kept reporting the lie. The reality was that the replacement aircraft was supposed to have gone into production years before. Naturally, in the post-Vietnam and Jimmy Carter era, anti-defense liberals found endless reasons for never launching the new plane. Then Reagan came along. Most of the great procurement wars of that era were over systems that should have been fielded much earlier.

Modernization has been taking a beating in recent years due to sequestration and the cost of active wars in the Middle East. There's a considerable backlog. Spare parts is the least of it.

46 posted on 07/17/2018 12:42:39 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
its easy to see how the Pentagon has gone from $2.3 trillion to over $9 trillion U.S. tax dollars

Tough to take this seriously when this nonsense is spouted. The national GDP is $17T. The Pentagon is not worth half of our national output.

47 posted on 07/17/2018 12:44:41 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I haven't been near one for three-plus years, and that confounded jingle is STILL stuck in my head ("You save big money, you save big money, when you shop Menard's")

I get to go home to Michigan every year and spend a lot of money at Menard's remodeling my retirement home. I am amazed they still use that exact same jingle in their stores as when I first entered a Menard's in 1985. It must drive their employees crazy but I do love Menard's.

48 posted on 07/17/2018 12:54:50 PM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I imagine some of that money went to intelligence community black ops.


49 posted on 07/17/2018 12:56:07 PM PDT by A strike (Natural events are just God moving His stuff around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

B-52s and KC-135s have a single can in which to pee and poop. First one to use it has to empty it after the mission so many crew members fly in pain so they don’t have to empty the can. After the first poor sap goes then everybody else lets her rip.


50 posted on 07/17/2018 1:01:07 PM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I was thinking an old stump, chainsaw, whittling knife and a quart of shellac - but your idea is better. I fixed my busted up plastic bumper like new. I bet youtube has how to repair a Galaxy seat cover.

When I saw the headline, I was thinking my grandmother could knit one - but I was thinking of the cover for the seat cover.


51 posted on 07/17/2018 1:04:40 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

How did you safely get into my house to take that picture? Did you throw in some cat treats before you came in?


52 posted on 07/17/2018 1:07:37 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I once found a needle in a haystack but it wasn't the one I was looking for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Does anybody else remember the flap over the $600 replacement toilet seats for P-3 aircraft? I was still on ACDU in the P-3 community at the time and frankly we thought nothing of it. The aircraft were last built almost 20 years before the toilet seat issue came up. Because spare toilet seats were not an authorized spare (or all the spares had been consumed) it was necessary to find a contractor to make them one off. That’s why they cost so much, and that’s likely the same issue here.


53 posted on 07/17/2018 1:24:04 PM PDT by Afterguard (Deplorable me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
This is pure reporting malpractice. No one pays $10,000 for a “toilet seat.”

First rational answer i've seen in this thread. This "Toilet Seat Cover" kerfuffle appeared years ago with the same sort of histrionics. Someone finally posted a picture of the item in question, and it wasn't what people normally think of as a toilet seat cover. It was this large multi-angled monstrosity that enclosed the entire toilet system, and looked as though 10,000 dollars for it was not all that unreasonable.

54 posted on 07/17/2018 1:36:33 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard
According to Wikipedia, Lockheed charged $34,560 for 54 toilet covers, or $640 each. After Reagan raised a stink, the price was adjusted downward to about $100 each. I don't know if Lockheed made them in house, or subcontracted them out.

But exactly like some of the responders on this thread, people then instantly concluded that the items in question were identical to the toilet seats sold in every home store on the planet.

Nothing could be further from the truth. This is the actual part in question:


55 posted on 07/17/2018 1:54:10 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 trillion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
The Shadow!


56 posted on 07/17/2018 3:14:18 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

Well, they’re paying for something other than a toilet seat.


57 posted on 07/17/2018 3:16:25 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

*** “The Pentagon is not worth half of our national output” ***

They don’t call it the “Puzzle Palace” for nothing.
Hillary tapped that resource and disappeared a bunch of $

When Mom and Dad Clinton croak Chelsea Hubble won’t be /isn’t adept or smart enough to keep all of those stolen funds ... But then the Partner Soros kid’s are smart enough.

Follow the $
(Not to mention Congressmen, Senators, EX Presidents etc)
It is all a Giant Scam ... Politicians go in making $65K per year and go out being Multi Millionaires ... gee how did that happen?

The folks that make the Laws are NOT going to kill that Golden Goose ... we have to find another way.


58 posted on 07/17/2018 4:49:30 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Damn the Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

It’s not actually a seat cover as the article leads one to believe. Its a panel that mounts around the toilet and against the bulkhead of the aircraft. It has to fit peculiar bends and angles and is attached with stainless steel screws. Obsolescence is a big thing in the Military right now. Our aircraft, Ships and Heavy Hardware are old and parts that were not suppose to break are failing. But the troops make due. And I would bet that the 10K price isn’t each (probably includes engineering and initial set up fees.


59 posted on 07/18/2018 4:33:24 AM PDT by Garvin (Always remember folks, kill a commie for mommy ~ Semper Fi, Mac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo

See post #59


60 posted on 07/18/2018 4:34:20 AM PDT by Garvin (Always remember folks, kill a commie for mommy ~ Semper Fi, Mac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson