I don't understand the law well enough to know if the 9th circuit's ruling will affect other jurisdictions.
The answer to your question is ‘no’ for two reasons.
First, this is just a preliminary injunction, not a final determination by the trial court that was the subject of the appeal.
Second, Colorado is in the 10th Circuit and New York is in the 2nd. So the 9th Circuit could be argued as persuasive, but it certainly wouldn’t be binding as to either state.
We’ve had district puke judges making immigration decisions that apply nationwide so why not this?
9th circuit’s ruling will affect other jurisdictions.
Nor do I although I’m sure the various circuit courts look at each other’s ruling’s, they are not bound by then. When Circuit courts are in opposition the Supreme Court steps in and resolves the issue.
“Ramifications for the other states? NY has an almost identical ban, Colorado has a 15 round limit.”
I think New Groinsey and Massaupchuck does too.