An excellent point!
Where my problem lay is that the old assumes invalidity where the New may situationally assume validity or invalidity.
So the New Bulverism might give someone a pat on the back for believing something they “only think that because you are” even as it gives someone else the bird while asserting a philosophically similar cause.
This is ground I’ve mainly stumbled on before. I’m not a Jordan Peterson.
Whatever I say is true, because I am _____?
Anything other than _____ism, may not be considered?
I am not clear enough on the concept to summarize it.