Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ninth Circuit Panel Rules CA Unsafe Handgun Act not Covered by Second Amendment
Gun Watch ^ | 10 August, 2018 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 08/10/2018 5:20:39 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
The Ninth Circuit is hostile to the Second Amendment.
1 posted on 08/10/2018 5:20:40 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

There was some talk of abolishing the Ninth Circus Court. Do it!


2 posted on 08/10/2018 5:23:40 AM PDT by donozark (Fat People are Hard to Kidnap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Which will be reversed by SCOTUS.

Time to break up the 9th Circuit and pack the remnants with common-sense, constitutional jurists!

MAGA - Make Appeals Courts Great Again


3 posted on 08/10/2018 5:24:05 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The new Oldsmobiles are in early this year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The 9th Circuit has 22 judges, with 6 slots being vacant and subject to being filled by Trump. The district courts in the 9th will have 24 vacancies out of 122 to be filled by Trump.

If we can retain control of the Senate, we can shift the 9th.

4 posted on 08/10/2018 5:29:40 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It rubs the rainbow on it's skin or it gets the diversity again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

Only if SCOTUS agrees to hear the case. They have not agreed to hear a Second Amendment case from the Ninth Circuit yet.


5 posted on 08/10/2018 5:30:22 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Sorry, correction, 29 judgeships not 22.


6 posted on 08/10/2018 5:31:14 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It rubs the rainbow on it's skin or it gets the diversity again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Actually, the least restrictive constitutional test is rational basis.


7 posted on 08/10/2018 5:46:41 AM PDT by jimfree (My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

How about manufacturers refuse to cater to Kalifornia - if nobody there can buy guns or cars, then the good ones will leave and the State will rot itself to death....


8 posted on 08/10/2018 5:50:45 AM PDT by trebb (Too many "Conservatives" who think their opinions outweigh reality these days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
-- The Ninth Circuit is hostile to the Second Amendment. --

Quelle surprise.

Nearly all, effectively all of the US Federal Court system is hostile to the 2nd amendment to some degree. Even SCOTUS, which redefined the holding of the Miller case.

To be covered by the 2nd amendment in the test applied in the Miller case, the weapon had to have a military use. Under the Miller holding redefined by a majority in the Heller case, weapons that have been successfully restricted to the military by long standing laws are not covered by the 2nd amendment.

At any rate, the recent 9th Circuit circular reasoning and redefinition of intermediate scrutiny is nothing new or surprising. Courts are bastions of rationalizing outcomes with dishonest logic. No moral authority whatsoever.

9 posted on 08/10/2018 5:54:27 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I knew that the Ninth Circus would only get worse once Cauliphonya legalized “medical” marijuana as a “recreational” drug.


10 posted on 08/10/2018 5:57:57 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Our Judicial system is unconstitutional.


11 posted on 08/10/2018 6:02:43 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The third provision, adopted to aid law enforcement, requires new handguns to stamp microscopically the handgun’s make, model, and serial number onto each fired shell casing.

Always police your brass...

12 posted on 08/10/2018 6:23:55 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Well just collect a little stamped brass at the local, and toss it around your favorite crime scene and just sit back and watch the fun.


13 posted on 08/10/2018 6:25:21 AM PDT by Dusty Road (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Actually, the least restrictive constitutional test is rational basis.


Yes, least restrictive for the government.

Almost anything can pass rational basis. The government just has to make a claim that there is some rational reason for the law. It does not have to be true.

In several circuits, “Intermediate scrutiny” has collapsed to “rational basis”.

But, I am not a lawyer. I am willing to be educated to a different understanding.


14 posted on 08/10/2018 6:25:54 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

This is why the Rats are going to fight with everything they have to stop Kavanaugh it keeps the Supreme at 4-4 until next year. Renegade Judges can run wild and the 9th circus can set precedents


15 posted on 08/10/2018 6:26:56 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Rational basis is essentially being able to articulate a legitimate government interest and stops there. Intermediate scrutiny steps that up to an important government interest and requires that the government action must be through means that further that interest. Intermediate scrutiny is commonly used for sex discrimination. Strict scrutiny requires a "compelling government interest" with the government action narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. Strict scrutiny is applied when basic rights are involved - speech, religion, etc.

This online legal dictionary runs through each of the review levels with some good examples.

Legal Dictionary Article on Strict Scrutiny

16 posted on 08/10/2018 6:38:46 AM PDT by jimfree (My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: donozark
"There was some talk of abolishing the Ninth Circus Court. Do it!"

You realize, of course, that if that were to actually happen a leftist judge would overrule the decision...

17 posted on 08/10/2018 6:42:16 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
...requires new handguns to stamp microscopically the handgun’s make, model, and serial number onto each fired shell casing.

Does any company actually make such a thing? I wish every firearm and ammo manufacturer would refuse to do business in Kali, including all of their law enforcement.

18 posted on 08/10/2018 6:56:37 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Yes, that is the way I have read it.

The Ninth Circuit, in Peruta, simply accepts the idea that restricting access to guns promotes safety. The ignored the fact that open carry is banned in California.


19 posted on 08/10/2018 7:10:53 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Easier: Buy a revolver.


20 posted on 08/10/2018 7:13:30 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson