People do not retain security clearances after they leave the job, even if they are not fired. They no longer need to know. It has always been this way.
So the question is: is the author of this tripe truly stupid, or is he a new world order toady attempting to promote the notion that clearance revocation requires some sort of justification?
There isn’t a third possibility. Those are the only two.
But, they can still be informed legally via back door contacts. The revocation makes such information sharing illegal. Brennan is a Wahabis Muslim convert as well as a communist sympathizer. Is this someone who can be trusted?
It has been a tradition that intelligence officials and others in case they are called in to provide advice.
It is optional and should be reserved for those you trust and whose advice you value.
I dont think it applies in this case, especially someone who runs right to the LEFT MEDIA CARTEL for a big paycheck. I hope he gets hit hard in the pocketbook for his buffoonery.