Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Federalist Patriot

Well I don’t know about other FReepers, but I always assumed that all clearances were always dependent on actually having a job which had a real need to know things.

I think that is the way things should work. Always. For everyone. Completely.

This sort of seems like an out-of-control mess.

Actually.

I’m sure I am not alone in feeling this way.


22 posted on 08/18/2018 7:18:28 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cba123

Congress hands out its own security clearances to itself and its own staffers. The FBI only investigates after there is a serious security breach, but the FBI can’t revoke clearance. Note the great Awan coverup.


23 posted on 08/18/2018 7:26:20 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

you may have hit a nerve there.

Without a need to know how is this beneficial in their post-govt jobs.

They cant talk about anything they have seen past or present.

How does this prevent from doing their post govt job. Contractor jobs would be more about who you know. Helping beltway bandits get the inside track on contracts. Again their security clearance has nothing to do with it.

They are not a perk, they are a necessary process to secure secrets that are necessary for the security of the country.

To talk about a security clearance in the context of being an analyst on a tv show is insulting to critical thinking Americans.


52 posted on 08/18/2018 1:42:33 PM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing, they win and we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson