Forget it. Just stay home, redo the house, AND rent a cabin.
It kind of looks like a clown threw up everywhere in there. I’d rather save the money, and not risk the ecoli, and rent a beach house for a few weeks and be within walking distance of a really good grocery store and a liquor store.
Oh... and I’d need Netflix...
Been on many cruises with different lines. The day I spend that much money to stay in my room, as that is what the cost reflects, I’ll get a room in Greece and go see something rather than a couple of poorly painted walls. I don’t go for the ship. I go for the sightseeing the ship goes to. Otherwise, I can paint my house for a whole lot less and get the same thing without motion sickness those colors must bring out.
rwood
You can charter an entire yacht with crew for a week for a lot less than that.
The whole point is to show everybody that you can aford to waste $170k. It makes no sense to have all that when you’re on a cruise ship hopefully going someplace.
Charter a midsize ship, personal service and a lot more space and privacy.
This is hype by the press at its best. You can get that suite for a fraction of the 170K price tag they are reporting. They are using a one-time extreme example at best, or perhaps completely made up.
What hideous decor!
Chuck E. Cheese on acid. Bad trip.
Not one comment at the link is positive.
What hideous accommodations!
That gives me an idea, though.
If they decorated prisons and jails to look like that, I’ll bet the crime rate would drop significantly.
The Norwalk is free!
For the folks who have more money than good sense...
Honestly for 170k for a week, you can charter an entire luxury yacht, why would anyone pay that for a cabin to be on a boat with 5,000 other people?
I know most would never pay that for a vacation, but if you are, why would you ever choose this option over a privat yacht?