Posted on 09/10/2018 10:06:58 AM PDT by Starman417
Are there no editors?
If they will not prosecute Hillary Clinton then couldn’t this be claimed as an unequal application of he law?
Yes.
It’s insane what Harris did. And the rhetoric that Kavanaugh is a perjurer is ubiquitous and insane.
There are, but they ain't cheap.
Insanity is everywhere.
Look at the face on that highly privileged individual. That is not a face you can trust. That is a face that is trying to get you.
Don't need one when you have spell check /s
No unreasonable Leftist Statist vindictive shylock would consider NOT prosecuting President Trump under these circumstances.
When they left claims ANTHING, you know the opposite is true. You can tell they're lying if their mouth is open (or in some cases the very dumbest ones may be mouth-breathing).
Remember we used to mock WJC with his depends what is is and ‘No, I was never in the White House alone with Ms Lewinski - always guards or secretaries around’ etc.
Now most of us would think a question such as
‘Were you ever alone with her in Memphis’ would call for a yes or no answer BUT better specify yes because there is ALWAYS someone else in Memphis.
I had ‘joked’ earlier about Scooter Libby..
Is your name Scooter Libby.
YES does not suffice unless you say ‘Well everyone has always called me ‘Speedo but my real name is Mr Earl’ is necessary.
Martha was that YOUR recipe for cookies...YES..
Martha why did you lie to us when you know your grandmother got that recipe from Mrs X and handed it down to you....NO SOUP FOR YOU!!
6 months in the hoosegow for telling such a blatant lie.
ETC ETC
I watched Harris hector Kavanaugh about having had a meeting with some random law firm in DC, trying to produce a “gotcha” moment. It made her look simplistic, stupid and petty.
No online publised periodical ever seems to be edited these days. Very off-putting.
Speaking of off-putting: something about Kamala Harris makes my skin crawl, much the same way as 0bama makes my skin crawl, only not to the same degree. He’s off the charts.
It’s instructive to see how K. Harris’ questioning progressed. She asked BK if he ever talked to anyone “from the “Kasowitz law firm” about xxxxxxxx.
Now, if you search for this firm and look on its website, you’ll see they have offices in New York, Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Newark, NJ, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, and Washington DC.
You could easily be talking about an 500, maybe 800 attorney law firm (I have no idea) but it’s obviously an enormous firm and those attys leave and new ones are hired on a modestly continuous basis, and BK could have easily talked to any number of them and not known they were employed by that firm, or once were, or any variation, and the idea that a person, even a very smart person, could catalog perhaps 50 or 100 potential contacts (wandering around the Wash DC cocktail circuit) and then filter them on an arbitrary ad hoc basis is absurd.
That is the perjury trap. Note that she asked three different variations of the same question.
I make typos all the time when I post quickly from my phone. FR is not the National Spelling Bee or an Ivy League Grammar Club.
[Look at the face on that highly privileged individual. That is not a face you can trust. That is a face that is trying to get you.]
When she smugly purses her lips during her questioning, I just want to punch her in the mouth.
The Last Chance? [Can Trump revive the aspirational Spirit of '76?]
I watched Harris grill Kavanaugh with questions she knew he couldn’t/wouldn’t answer, and then shut him down when he tried to answer.
I couldn’t help but wonder how any intelligent person could ever vote for her till realizing the question provided the answer; intelligent people didn’t vote for her.
Harris is an evil witch. Lucky for us she’s also quite a stupid one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.