Posted on 09/19/2018 5:51:41 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Unhinging the already unhinged
To get the full picture of Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford you don’t have to torture yourself going back over a 3-decade-long trajectory asking yourself why it took her so long to come forward with the tawdry tale how she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh and his friend in high school “sometime” during the early 1980s.
The full picture is Blasey decked out in her specially-made pink pussy cap, the one she sported at the Big Women’s March the day after President Donald Trump’s inauguration; the one she will likely wear for the rest of her life.
In the meantime ...
CNN Dedicates Segment to President’s Penis...
Kav’s Accuser — Christine Blasey Ford
. . . . .
Two birds with one stone:
1. Battle for Supreme Court
2. Exposing just how depraved ‘higher’ learning has become.
. . . . .
Soros Connection [Washington Times]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3688700/posts
A. Debra Katz [Ford’s lawyer] is vice chair of the Project on Government Oversight, an organization that has been directly funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation...
B. A Soros Group ‘Demand Justice’, put $5 mil into blocking Kav.
. . .
The Legal Advisor for Kavanaugh’s Accuser Is a Big Time Democratic Donor, Thinks People Who Work for Trump Are ‘Miscreants’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3688035/posts
. . .
I’ve heard things in talk-radio:
1. How her students think she’s wacko. ‘Creepy and insane.’
2. That this ‘reluctant’ witness had taken a lie detector test back in August. [Such foresight if true.]
3. That she might have [maybe— I’m definitely not confident about this] made the same accusation reg. another nominee ? ? ?
4. That she could not even remember the year of this attempted rape.
5. Could not remember where.
6. Could not remember how many people present.
7. Didn't tell anyone. Never mentioned it until over 20 years later as excuse for infidelity at marital counseling.
8. Scrubbed her social media accounts before going public.
RUSH: Okay, folks. I want to share some things with you that may be fake news, but if they’re not fake, I want to be on record as having had them for you. There’s a Twitter thread out there. I have no idea the veracity because, as you know, I do not “twit.” But this particular thread claims that the reason that Dianne Feinstein was reluctant to go public with Christine Blasey Ford’s letter is because she received a similar letter from the woman about Judge Gorsuch. No idea whether this is fake news or true.
But given who we’re talking about here, I can believe that it would be true, ‘cause I think we’re dealing with genuinely disturbed, emotionally depraved, poisoned-with-hatred lunatics. I have no idea if it’s true. There’s another bit of news going around that has a little bit more credibility but still it doesn’t pass the “definitely happened” test. It is that Peter Strzok Smirk and Lisa Page were caught destroying evidence on their final days at the FBI. Neither two bits of news can be confirmed. But let me tell you something.
The New York Times and the Washington Post and USA Today and all the rest of them are publishing fake news and lies every damn day without one bit of concern whether they’re true or not, and half of them they didn’t even bother to correct. And it’s not something normally that I get into. But these two things have the tinge of believability to them, and I just want to get them out there in case it eventuates that they’re actually true. I can’t confirm either one.
But you know, I’m sick and tired of being hampered here. These people get to lie and distort and do whatever they want under the banner of premier journalism each and every day, making up sources, making up quotes, writing such things as, “President Trump, without evidence, today claimed” blah, blah. But they never say, “Christine Blasey Ford, without evidence, claimed today that Brett Kavanaugh pinned her down in a high school room in a house and so forth 42 years ago when they both were...” Who knows.
This article originally appeared on Rush Limbaugh
Comments
Rush Limbaugh
‘8. Scrubbed her social media accounts before going public.’
THAT is a big one.
Thank you.
Yeah, she really must have posted some way-out things. And I bet there’s a good chance that they will come out.
I think they are coaching her. She is probably way too impulsive to talk with republican senators any time soon. Been ranting on the internet would be my guess, why it was scrubbed.
“Yeah, she really must have posted some way-out things. And I bet there’s a good chance that they will come out.”
And if/when it does, I hope chrissy gets everything that’s coming to her.
Undoubtedly with swift & efficient assistance from the YUCs (young upcoming commies) at Gugal, Fakebook, & Twits-R-Us.
Yes. She ranged on FB so they scrubbed it.
Brilliant. Stolen.
What does a brain shaped ladyparts hat even mean? That women only think with their sexual organ? Didn’t feminists say that was the problem with men?
“CNN Dedicates Segment to President’s Penis...”
CNN probably spends a lot of time thinking about that.
Did Hillary give her a hand?
CNN probably spends a lot of time thinking about that.
Mostly the male jo-urinal-ist.
That’s because in addition to CNN being ISIS, CNN is GAY.
CNN Dedicates Segment to President’s Penis...
New tagline:
And there was an immediate lineup of support from 60 females who spent time with him in highschool and college.
I even heard one report — 200 women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.