![](https://vectortoons.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/celebrating-collection-carol-009.jpg"") Christine Boozy Ford "Party Doll" (youtube music video) |
Posted on 09/22/2018 9:26:07 AM PDT by detective
|
Christine Boozy Ford "Party Doll" (youtube music video) |
There are a number of accounts of further statements where she accounts wearing a swimming suit under her clothes.
A young girl going with four boys to a private home, with no mention of swimming involved, and where drinking is going on, wears a swimming suit under her clothes for one reason that comes to mind.
She intends to interact with others but does not want to have clothing easily removed for interaction other than what she plans.
“Well she passed a polygraph test....
... The only evidence we have is that she isn’t intentionally lying...”
****************************
And you “know” this how? Because a lawyer working with her says so? What question(s) was/were on this purported examination (as specified by the “subject”) by a paid “expert”?
And you’ve now concluded that you have “evidence” to support her thought processes.
Please don’t construe this post as an attack on you — it’s not. I just don’t like to see any of us givin ANY credence to this Agendanista’s allegation.
We have no idea how many women were prepped for this accusation. Billions of dollars for the democrats are at stake. Everyone saw how many women came forward about DJT...how many were credible?
We know the internet was scrubbed, and that is a clear indication of theater, along with the last minute timing, precluding a proper vetting of the accuser. We are pretty certain the issue is Roe v Wade, which no one remembers the actual ruling anymore, and it is election season.
My hope is that the result is turns out the democratic base and turns off the independents.
But if this nominee does not get a vote...
DK
#52 That is the definition of a democrat : )
...deliberately lying or too mentally unbalanced to know what the truth is.
“Well she passed a polygraph test”
So have I. It means nothing because polygraphs measure stress, they don’t identify lies.
It’s up to the operator to ‘interpret’ what your reactions, if any, mean.
And in her case the polygraph was administered by her Trump hating lawyer’s team, hardly a neutral party.
And someone who’s nuts, which may well apply to her, is capable of believing that their fantasies are true.
How do we know that she isn’t intentionally lying?
This letter does not read like it was written by a highly educated professor/psychologist. It sounds like a teenage girl. She is a grown woman who should know the way of the world by now. If she sent the letter, why did she expect to remain anonymous. If she truly felt compelled to tell her story, she’d have taken the next plane out to have her day in court, so to speak.
Seems her attorneys are trying to create a new precedent with all of their demands.
The one that did, in the very beginning, has taken back her support saying:
1. That she didn’t think she’d get this much scrutiny on her support.
2. She later clarified that she didn’t actually hear or see anything the “night of the alleged” incident, she just heard about it in school.
So basically, she has absolutely no one supporting her claims in any way, shape or form.
Why was she using the upstairs bathroom in the first place. This was not a trailer...it was a house with a pool. Even we had a downstairs bathroom in the 80's.
Notice also that she doesn't mention what the boys were wearing. Likely, one of the first things one "being killed and raped" might describe.
The polygraph in question was not administered when Ford was 15, but 36 years later.
Forget not being admissible in court, it shouldn't be admissible in Congressional testimony nor in the news media.
Taking a polygraph 36 years after an event supposedly happened?
Alien abductees could pass that polygraph test.
IF there was a polygraph test.
I FOUND IT !
If her father was really linked to CIA then he would be worried. His position as President of Burning Tree Golf Club. Is also now tainted. Her parents must be so worried there is no telling what could come out from all this.As they are getting ready for a quiet retirement,they have to deal with this and factor it in.CBF might drain the swamp herself.You don’t spend $40,000.00 on tuition and expect this kind of nonsense. At this point there is no telling how many lives will be hurt by these allegations and what is revealed going forward.The left always thinks they are smarter then everyone else until they reallyF up.if this helps cause a huge red wave, CBF might be blamed.
Yes, there were four boys at the party and she was wearing a bathing suit. Based on the pictures of the kinds of bathing suits those girls wore, it was probably a bikini.
Yes....’80s were certainly bikini years.
Because her female classmate was already pulling a train in the downstairs bathroom.
If it happened 35+ years ago, how come nobody but nobody heard about it until she says she told her therapist in 2012? Sounds really fishy!
This was a school where the children of rich prominent parents went...and then they would have gone on to good colleges and now have fairly high placed jobs...doctors lawyers...judges..maybe politicians...
do you really think even one of the men will come forward now and admit he was a friend of Ford’s in HS ???
Immediately he would be one of the 50+ guys who she slept with...whether or not he did score or was a rare one who missed out...
A man shall not be convicted on the testimony of one person. - God.
Great testimony and analysis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.