Posted on 09/24/2018 4:28:47 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Planned Parenthood meticulously stared planning the takedown of Brett Kavanaugh as long as six years ago
The takedown of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh didn’t start with Christine Blasey Ford or Senator Dianne Feinstein. It started with a Planned Parenthood photoshopped ad i way back in November of 2012 that depicted Kavanaugh as a “newcomer”.
With all the histrionics of Ford now jarring front page headlines, it is not easy too see that she’s only the bit player in the #MeToo assassination of Brett Kavanaugh, a prop moved forward by Planned Parenthood when the time was right.
Roe v. Wade isn’t a statute, and it won’t be “repealed.” We might see some good decisions in regards to the matter, though.
Women should be more concerned about their constitutional rights. In countries without those rights, women were promised freedoms, more respect and wild fun. Women in those countries were subsequently bought, sold, tortured then discarded like broken (or dead) toys.
I’ve seen the numbers tattooed on imported women in some very upscale places here, in the States—not prostitution but in regular service jobs. I’ve seen the fear in their eyes and their hopes that they will be able to pay their own prices in order to escape. That’s why we need to see Judge Kavanaugh in the Supreme Court.
Don’t listen to the fascist, foreign, coastal propaganda that distracts from the big picture of what we’re facing.
Ban abortions except for rape or for the mother’s physical health.
Drive these damn harpy dykes insane!
Ban abortions period except for a limited number of medical conditions. Leaving an exception for the health of the mother is a loophole big enough to drive a 747 through and many have done just that
“Ban abortions except for rape or for the mother’s physical health.
“Drive these damn harpy dykes insane”
True dykes have no such worries.
The Supreme Court can’t ban abortions that leftist states allow.
Only a constitutional amendment can put abortion back into a proper place.
Not unless you consider the unborn as persons worthy of protection under the 14th Amendment.
Scalia did not. I think Thomas might, however.
Thanks Sean_Anthony.
Yes they do. The urgent goal of LBGT was to disassociate sexuality from reproduction. They’ve been so fantastically successful that most people reading this on a right-wing website probably initially think I’m talking about sex isn’t supposed to be enjoyable, the parody of pre-Vatican Catholic Social Teaching.
How do lesbians get pregnant?
It is not right to kill preborn babies.
You will not learn it from the animal kingdom. You will not learn it from the great religious books. This knowledge comes from the pits of hell and liberals in education.
Check out Psalm 139:12-16.
Actually abortion in case of rape is exactly what the rapist hopes in order not to pay for it and erase evidence.
What is needed is to protect women who are pimped and then sent to abortion clinics to avoid the pimps and soy boys footing medical bills and child rearing bills.
Amazing that pregnant woman abandonment is not deemed grievious in similar ways to child abandonment. What choice is there when a woman is abandoned?
Abortion should be in cases of abandonment , and if so the rapist should pay both in prison time for rape and child murder, period.
That would put a damper on Planned Parenthood.
Some lesbians do guys occasionally. But being lesbians, they are not used to using birth control.
We should ban any form of mysoginistic sadistic “medicine” such as Planned Parenthood, see my post above.
When we get enough good justices, it can be overturned.
Interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.