Posted on 10/03/2018 4:49:13 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
And think about it, they wouldn’t want her to testify again if she hadn’t already stepped in her own perjury trap. (Whatever happened, by the way, to “False in One,, False in All?). The only reason they would want her to be interviewed again is so they can demand a second crack at him.
Bttt.
5.56mm
speaking of CPL, some were wondering who was financing him.
Maybe his racing sponsors are worth a look-see, to see who they might be?
GB Autosport
VERVA Lechner racing team
JMW Motorsport
Dempsey Del Piero racing
Competition Motorsports (multiple)
Alex Job Racing
Synergy Racing
https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/michael-avenatti/
...”I honestly believe Brett Kavenaugh really IS a choir boy and what the democrats and Soros minions have done IS prosecutable and SHOULD be prosecuted.”...
I really believe that prosecutions are coming. The scales of justice must come into play here. Otherwise, we live under a toothless system where anything goes.
While we’re at it, let’s get to the bottom of who was behind all the internet scrubbing. If you go to Stanford, her profile was spiked so we couldn’t get any notion of her work there. For the past couple of weeks it was totally blank, but today her profile does show some basic information (but no publications).
https://profiles.stanford.edu/christine-blasey
However, it is all still sitting in the Wayback Machine.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150910060006/https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/christine-blasey
(it appears blank, but right click, view source to see her publication list).
Is it safe to say only Leftists can get this sort of hand-holding from social media/digital entities? Does anyone believe a conservative woman could get the same total whitewash of her entire online presence to hide it from the nation?
Who doesn’t?
Nice find - he has a rather lackluster racing career, doesn’t he? ;’}
Hi.
Has anyone found her yearbook yet? Thanks.
5.56mm
Great writing, I look forward to these each day.
Who doesn’t?
Thanks, y’all. I look forward to writing them each day, too.
As of this morning, Ms. Ford’s fairy tale has fallen completely apart. It turns out that, not only is there no one out there who can verify a single shred of it, but there are people out there who have been able to completely debunk pretty much all of it. It turns out that Ms. Ford is not just a fabricator, but, if what her former boyfriend attests to in a sworn statement supplied yesterday to the Senate Judiciary Committee, she may even be a bit of a pro at it
Justice delayed is justice denied. GET THE ROPE.
I’m not sure they found Ford’s exact yearbook (that she owns) if that’s what you mean. However, her school’s yearbook was posted online here.
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/
Until it was turned off. No one knows why.
However, drop that bad boy into the Wayback Machine and you can see the yearbook stuff.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180927123412/http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/
I think Archive.org may emerge as one of the most important historical documents of the first generation of digital natives. There’s no telling how much value it has in keeping track of bad players in our political and culture realms. Look for it to be purchased by a giant conglomerate and put out to pasture.
Also, emerging digital platforms like Facebook and Twitter avoid having their stuff recorded because everything is behind passwords and dispersed. That’s why someone like Ford could effectively disappear from the national radar when her social media history was wiped by her friends at Facebook.
I honestly believe Brett Kavenaugh really IS a choir boy and what the democrats and Soros minions have done IS prosecutable and SHOULD be prosecuted.
It can only happen during the Trump administration.
It is unfair in the extreme to accuse Kavanaugh in advance of wimping out. Especially in light of the task you are demanding: that he take on " EVERY, SINGLE person involved.”Understand, IMHO he should - but that includes “the MSM.” As you know perfectly well. And you know that the name of person before Kavanaugh who has been treated similarly by the MSM (read, “the Associated Press and its members individually”) is, “legion, for we are many.” George Zimmerman, the Duke lacrosse team, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Roy Moore, indeed every Republican to the right of John McCain (and even him, strategically). Going back to Senator Joseph McCarthy, and AFAIK beyond that.
Let’s be serious - “the MSM” is the Democrat Party - without that propaganda wind at their back they wouldn’t be a significant political force in America. My explanation of that is that cheap criticism is a profitable way to run a newspaper. That, and boasting of your own objectivity. Those two things make journalism ineluctably cynical. About society - not about government. In fact, cynicism towards society is naiveté towards government. For the simple reason that every criticism of society is a rationale for the idea that “there oughta be a law.”
What does the AP have to do with it? The AP “wire” is a continuous virtual meeting of all major US journalism. Adam Smith told us in 1776 what to expect of that:
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (1776)Understand, all wire services have similar homogenizing effect, and all of them actually violate the Sherman AntiTrust Act of 1890. But the AP was aggressively monopolistic from its pre-Civil War inception.Note that Scalia attached significance to the odd wording of the First Amendment, “the freedom . . . of the press.” He pointed out that freedom of the press existed prior to the First Amendment, but that freedom was limited by libel laws then - and now. without the “the” in the formulation, it would mean absolute freedom. With it, there are legitimate restraints.
So yes, by all means "take EVERY, SINGLE person involved with hurting him and his family to court ... to the greatest extent of the law.” But it ain’t no picnic to do it. The "greatest extent of the law” would be both Sherman and RICO. And if you think the Democrats and “the Media” are going crazy now . . .
Suing a person is doable and smart.
Let the losers of the lawsuits scream at the democrat party that hosed them.
THAT'S not our (Kavenaugh's) problem.
The stupid people should have been smarter.
Perjury's a crime.
The law is blind to 'details' like sex or social position. If Ford lied under oath in a meaningful way she needs to be prosecuted for perjury - to the full extent of the law.
Suing a person is doable and smart.
The person is a gnat. The problem is journalism. Suing the person might work - on that one person. The institution is the problem.
This case and these individuals are now know around the planet.
There are written accusatory statements that are flat out lies.
This case and these individuals are now know around the planet.
There are written accusatory statements that are flat out lies.
. . . and the NYT needs to rearrange its sock drawer.Journalists can always change the subject. Always.
The only way to really get the MSM where it hurts would be to require it (the AP and its members) to run a propaganda campaign that will get Kavanaugh’s poll numbers where they by rights ought to be.
Make the sanctions so severe, on an ongoing basis, (something like requiring it to burn prime time reading a judicial finding against itself every night) that journalism will suddenly realize that Kavanaugh is and always was a great guy.
Nothing less could possibly be adequate compensation.
I never mentioned that.
I am only concerned with suing Ford and Feinstein and all the et cetera's.
I don't care about the media.
. . . but if the media cares about you . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.