The moderators there are not considered to be pro-Trump, and have banned, or shadow-banned, other pro-Trump posters.
Not really. Never heard of any of these so called publishers or writers
Reddit is useless trash
The professional conservative class has the answer to your dilemma; start your own Google, Twitter or r/The_Donald, whatever that is (/s)
I frequent The Donald as well. Flynn is a hard case. I think majority opinion is that an attack on Flynn is an attach on Trump. The Chalet is putting forward a minority opinion which is that Flynn played a role in framing Trump. Given that Trump himself has repeatedly put forward the former theory, I can see why The Donald moderators might take an attack on him as being an attack on Trump, which is of course a bannable offense at The Donald.
I’m also on T_D frequently, and I’m not really surprised by this. The 1st Amendment doesn’t apply on Reddit (on any sub) — if you doubt this, try to be pro-Trump on r/[redacted] (the left-leaning ‘politics’ subreddit whose name must never be mentioned on T_D, for fear of Reddit’s site mods accusing them of brigading).
Some interesting things I noticed:
- the article you linked is also from Chalet Books, the same website as the site that earned the ban from T_D.
- The article that earned the ban is simply a timeline... but it really doesn’t offer “proof”. The little bit of supposed proof from a handful of MSM articles is there is more “muh Russia” than anything with the scent of real news.
- The Chalet Books website isn’t about news, it’s about hocking books. It’s really that simple.
- Every link YOU have posted here on FR is also from Chalet Books... which makes me wonder what your connection is to them.
Is there a legitimate corroborating source for this claim about Flynn? I’d be interested to know if there is.
Without having more information to judge otherwise, it seems the T_D mods were right to use the banhammer.
Sowing discord and concern trolling are explicitly banned on T_D. T_D is a forum for supporting Trump, not a bastion of free speech. Support GEOTUS or hit the bricks.
Obviously, they felt your article was breaking their rules. I can see why, but I can also see why you might want to take it up with them and see if you can work it out. One thing’s for sure: Whatever the heck you’re doing here sure ain’t the way to handle it.