Mid-Term Results May Delayed Civil War. What Should We Expect Next?

DC Dirty Laundry ^ | 11/08/2018 | Mike Adams

[deandg99]

You may recall that months ago, I warned of a particular scenario that would lead to an eruption of mass violence on the Left, escalating to a civil war. That scenario involved two triggers: 1) Kavanaugh being confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and 2) The GOP holding the House in the mid-term elections.

As we all now know, the GOP lost the House, handing Dems enough of a split victory to avoid them taking to the streets in an eruption of violence. Thus, the worst case civil war scenario has been avoided… for now.

But make no mistake: Democrats only accept the outcome of this election because they won something. Had they failed to take the House, they would have denounced the election process and revolted with violence. They were fully prepared to do this, and the most radical Democrats remain dedicated to their goal of sweeping all constitutionalists out of power, assassinating the President and installing a communist leader to run their “utopian” society rooted in authoritarianism.

[old-ager]

I think he has a good headline, but I’m so glad you are here to keep us safe from bloggers.

[sport]

The Civil War has been going on for a long time, My FRiend, and as of now we are on the short end. We have had our politicians shot down while playing ball. We have had our people get the hell beaten out of them while attending political rallies or demonstrations by their goons. We have had our politicians ran out of restaurants while they eating a meal. We have had others, mostly women, terrorized by their hoodlums while in public. What more do you need for them to do? Take out an ad in the newspaper? Aaron Zellerman of JPFO once said that the "protestors" [read Anarchists] had to be met with protest sign for protest sign, person for person, and if necessary fist for fist.

[Pollard]

He’s been around since 2013 and has only posted OPs. Never once a reply to another freeper. No participation at all. Used to post occasionally but has stepped things up in 2018.

As to being a “blogger”; As far as I can see, he’s never written anything himself. Everything comes from elsewhere. Infowars, naturalnews, conservativeFiringLine.com and some others.

copypasta

[JimRed]

We’ll have to start baiting them about our increased senate seats.

[Rurudyne]

What will happen?

Well, the grievances of the Left which they’re ever more open about are opportunistic.

If successfully opposed they grow more shrill as they double down. If they ever gain ground they grow more demanding.

The Left shares that with things like Islam and, of course, the Gaystapo.

So expect AntiFa to be more violent, expect more harassment, and expect more virulent rhetoric. No matter what: expect it.

[Rurudyne]

Seriously, what’s with the “I’m not interested and you shouldn’t be either” attitude some people have? Is making a point of being vocal about not reading blogs a form of virtue signaling?

[Rurudyne]

Trump saw GAINS in the Senate ... but the Democrats are acting as if this is a historic rejection of a President.

Speaking of which: mwahahahaha!!

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/republican-gains-may-have-put-senate-out-of-reach-for-2020-democrats

“Republicans’ strong showing in Senate elections on Tuesday will not only allow President Trump to appoint a flood of conservative judges over the next two years, it will likely put a Senate majority out of reach for Democrats in 2020.”

RBG will be next to retire.

[Rurudyne]

It’s the same attitude that will demand a “little Sharia” to better get along with Muslims.

[GOPJ]

How about a ‘mini Civil War’...

All illegals get a free pass if they move to California and become the ‘brown servant class’ to the effing liberal elites out there... and in exchange we build a wall between the US and California... and they give up all Representatives in the US House...

Over time we let them become a “South American Hellhole”... with small numbers of very rich ‘elites’ and large numbers of dirt poor peasants... kind of like the direction they';re moving in now...

[upchuck]

Click bait site. Prolly should not be posted.

[Boogieman]

Yep, I think we’ve all been in a game of Monopoly were the guy who was hopelessly in debt just flipped the board.

[old-ager]

got you. carry on.

[Uncle Sham]

The only Constitutional ruling the Supreme Court could make about abortion is that the issue belongs to the individual states under the Tenth Amendment. This is actually what should have been the original ruling in Roe vs Wade. The Court could not rule on whether or not abortion is constitutional or not because doing so would be legislating from the bench, for one, and also doing so would also be against the Tenth Amendment. This issue is one specifically that only the states themselves can legislate and has no place at the federal level.

[GLDNGUN]

And if the USSC determines that life begins at conception?

[Uncle Sham]

"And if the USSC determines that life begins at conception?"

That would have to spring from a case brought before the court where it has Constitutional jurisdiction to make a ruling. Abortion, not being in the Constitution unless put there by an amendment, would remain a state issue. That means if you want such a ruling, it has to be as an enforcement to an existing law/amendment put in place by the federal government.