Taxpayer funded ABC discusses the virtues of using sex robots

The Caldron Pool ^ | November 7, 2018 | Caldron Pool

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Full title:

Taxpayer funded ABC discusses the virtues of using sex robots: “Is it such a bad thing if somebody has a relationship with a sex robot?”

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

This blog appears to be an Australian version of The Activist Mommy, which is a God-fearing, conservative, Christian blog.

DANG!

[KC_Lion]

[Robert DeLong]

According to sex bot inventor, Sergi Santos, it’s only a matter of time until human and robot marriages become as commonplace as the mobile phone.

Well then, we certainly do not need to worry about humans causing global warming if this is the case. The planet will soon depopulate the planet rather quickly if this becomes the norm.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Maybe not quite the same thing:

Some time ago, a monkey researcher separated infant monkeys from their mothers. Some were fed in isolation with a bottle attached to a wire screen. Others were fed from a "surrogate mother" which was a crude contraption covered with terry cloth, which provided a little bit of warm contact along with the milk.

The monkeys raised with minimal stimulation were quite mal-adapted, and had a very difficult time when reintroduced to other monkeys. The ones with the terry-cloth surrogates were still somewhat screwed up compared to those raised normally by their mothers, but not nearly as badly.

By analogy to this research, maybe sex-surrogate dolls would be of some help to frustrated INCELs.

BTW, the research I refer to was conducted by Harry F. Harlow. Here's a link describing them:

Harlow's Surrogate Monkey Mothers

[Mrs. Don-o]

Tagline

[MrEdd]

Mom, Dad, I’d like you to meet the banister...

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Down Under PING!

[Scrambler Bob]

“Before you know it, these robots will be doing your jobs
= = =

So some pedophile or rapist can send one out to do his job?

[Truthoverpower]

They don’t sue for half
They don’t have headaches
They don’t have periods
What’s not the love ?
(Totally kidding I think they’re stupid but not evil)

[Trump_the_Evil_Left]

Welllll...... It would be preferable to being with a Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi....... just sayin’

[TADSLOS]

LMAO!

[heterosupremacist]

*“Before you know it, these robots will be doing your jobs and marrying your children, your grandchildren, your friends,” Santos said.*

No. Not me, nor any of mine, will EVER sink to that level of depravity. We know right from wrong, and if anything is lower than paying hookers; it would have to be paying for a robo-hooker! What is wrong with these people?!

Speak only for yourself, Santos. You need some help...

[SERKIT]

This could lead to sexually transmitted computer viruses. If the robot wants to become trangendered, it would be a simple parts swap.

[Boogieman]

[Boogieman]

“if anything is lower than paying hookers; it would have to be paying for a robo-hooker!”

Meh, at least you can’t say the robo-hooker is being victimized. This is basically high-tech masturbation.

[Ancesthntr]

Now when I think of sex robots and where we’re going with A.I. technology...

---

Whoa, stop RIGHT there. A lot of guys won’t have too much of a problem with the “A.” part, if it is done well enough. But the “I.” part is absolutely a no-go problem.

Am I right, Laz?

[Mrs. Don-o]

Well sure. Robit-mating has the strong potential of being a destroyer of personality, marriage, family, kinship, societies, nations --- a destroyer of everything from souls to civilizations.

And who wants that?

I'll tell you who.

[Hot Tabasco]

“Is it such a bad thing if somebody has a relationship with a sex robot?”

It would beat dating a liberal female........

[Fred Nerks]

I'm guessing men just aren't interested in self-promoting sexologists who recommend sex toys.