[TalonDJ]

“If it’s that simple, it’s unconstitutional on its face. The SCOTUS would rule 9-0 against it if it came before them. Even the Fossil knows that.”

No way. There are people on that court that don’t believe its role has anything to do with the constitution. Count on it.

[cuban leaf]

There are people on that court that don’t believe its role has anything to do with the constitution. Count on it.

---

Then they would be more likely to side with Trump. Only those that think the constitution gives Acosta some right to act any way he wants and nothing can be done about it thins CNN could prevail. Without the constitutional argument this is even more of a slam dunk for the president - if it could be any more of one.

The whole case is beyond absurd. The idea that acosta can do and say anything he wants is, quite literally, insane.