I’m fond of the 10/22, but you don’t need the take-down version. Removing the screw that holds the receiver to the stock would be enough to create a shortened rifle capable of easier carry.
“I’m fond of the 10/22, but you don’t need the take-down version. Removing the screw that holds the receiver to the stock would be enough to create a shortened rifle capable of easier carry.”
Ditto. For ease of take-down (if critical), the screw can be swapped for one with a larger, finger tighten-able model.
The take-model in the Magpull backpacker stock is a really slick setup!
KYPD
I have a Ruger 10/22 Takedown integrally suppressed rifle, and I like the takedown configuration. Granted, a screw on the regular 10/22 doesn’t take all that long to deal with, but the takedown goes together even faster. I just find it neat and tidy - and quiet. With normal ammo you don’t need hearing protection, and with quiet ammo you’ve got a weapon where the shot is quieter than action.
I also have a Henry AR-7. It’s light, simple, and compact. The Ruger is fun to shoot. The Henry is not quite fun, but every shot goes where it’s supposed to. The rifle does its job.
“Removing the screw that holds the receiver to the stock would be enough to create a shortened rifle capable of easier carry.”
Keep in mind that the process of removing and replacing the action in the stock can change the point of aim significantly.