Scientists Want to Synthetically Create a Volcanic Winter – Are they Just Nuts?

Armstrong Economics ^ | Nov 28, 2018 | Martin Armstrong

[Tilting]

Believe it or not, pretend Scientists are actuall proposing to create a synthetic Volcanic Winter by spraying sun-dimming chemicals into the Earth’s atmosphere the same as a volcanoe when it erupts. These pretend research scientists at Harvard and Yale universities have published in the journal Environmental Research Letters proposing to inject an aerosol (SAI) to reduce the rate of global warming. They have propsed a completely unproven attempt to alter the planet using a technique involving spraying large amounts of sulfate particles into the Earth’s lower stratosphere at altitudes as high as 12 miles. They argue to deliver the sulfates with specially designed high-altitude aircraft, balloons or large naval-style guns. To accomplish this they want $3.5 billion, with annual costs of $2.25 billion a year over.

This is exactly as the chemtrail conspiracy theory which is based on the belief that long-lasting condensation trails are “chemtrails” consisting of chemical or biological agents are left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that are sprayed for undisclosed reasons. It seems that the pretend scientists have taken the chemtrail theories to a new level. They say they are only dimming the sun. Guess they have no clue about weather history and volcanic winters, Guess shattering 150 year cold records for thanksgiving is still too warm for these people.

Climate Change is not just simply that there is a unusual cold storm or heat wave. Yet these people harp on each individual event as proof of their theory. Real climate change has to do with shifting patterns of weather and the progressive long-term trend. Their forecasts are based upon assuming whatever trend is in motion will remain in motion. That is a fatal flaw in analysis if we are talking about markets or weather. They really need to understand that there are cycles to start with.

[dp0622]

I did read that liberals talk down their words when speaking with minorities :)

I read that on here. They’re such fake, condescending POS.

But back to the point. :)

Yeah, I don’t care how brilliant you are or how important a topic you are presenting, if what you wrote is just horrific in its grammar and structure, you MUST lose some credibility in the eyes of the reader.

You don’t lose ALL credibility of course, and this man is Very Likely Much Smarter than me.

It’s worth reviewing what one wrote for several reasons.

1. The readers will understand exactly what you are trying to say.

2. You will be taken more seriously by those who don’t know who you are.

[NormsRevenge]

There have been atmospheric experiments going on for years.

Just drop a couple bunker busters down a couple sensitive volcanos if they want to trigger a dark skies scenario.

They’ll get their ‘winter’.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

No- they are evil.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Fertilize the oceans with iron in order to sequester carbon dioxide;

But don't you DARE do it to produce more food for wild salmon resulting in a higher harvest.

[Tilting]

Here, hold my beer and watch this.

[jetson]

Step right up and get your thermo space suit right here. Good to 100 degrees below.