They have propsed a completely unproven attempt to alter the planet using a technique involving spraying large amounts of sulfate particles into the Earth’s lower stratosphere...
- -
If a private company did that it would be fined for air pollution.
Armstrong doesn’t write very well does he?
Here is my theory about those pushing for this, but first some initial assumptions:
1. They know the sun is cooling
2. They know Global Warming caused by CO2 is bunk
3. They have an endless thirst for political power
So you say we need to fly these particulate injection missions to cool off the earth. They start them and spray the stuff, they only spray around .01% of what is really needed to actually do this, they fake the rest of the flights on only use the stuff they spray when they have media go on their flights... They claim it is working and lo and behold the temps slowly start to NATURALLY drop ( as the sun itself dims naturally ) and they pat themselves on the back and tell us plebes that IN SPITE OF YOU CO2 SPEWING LOWLY WORMS...WE FIXED THE EARTH! We can’t come this close to disaster again, therefore we need to be given MORE POWER OVER YOUR EVERYDAY lives to PREVENT US FROM HAVING TO TAKE SUCH DRASTIC MEASURES!!!
Power Play, pure and simple!
Apparently they are unaware we are heading into a rather nasty super grand solar minimum.
A few decades ago “environmentalists” were panicing about sulfates in the atmosphere from industrial activity causing acid rain and destroying the oceans.
pretend research scientists at Harvard and Yale universities...
.....in two weeks, another story will be published claiming it’s “settled”
science
SO2 was reduced in the atmosphere to combat acid rain and it blocked sunlight.
I remember when Saddam’s threat to burn the Kuwaiti oil fields was enough to make Carl Sagsn wet himself for fear that we’d be plunged into nuclear winter.
This is at best a hypothesis, not a theory. A theory is developed as a contextual framework that explains the known data and allows the development of testable hypotheses. A hypothesis is a highly educated guess based on the existing data and which fits into the theoretical framework; it must be testable and always is paired with a null hypothesis. Theories are refined as the body of experimental evidence grows; hypotheses are accepted or rejected.
I believe the Sun is perfectly capable of dimming all by itself..without the assistance of Harvard and Yale “scientists”. And the sun has been doing just that recently. Sorry Harvard & Yale the train has leftthe station without you.
Hello McFly!!!
We’re going to get a few or more extra cold winters doing to the current cooling of the sun. An unusual lack of sunspots.
Wake up grant leeching science tools!
The Sun is going to do the job - they want to take credit....
They are not scientists. They just want billions of dollars so they can keep getting paid for doing stupid things.
What could go wrong?
“Inject sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to reflect a portion of the sun’s rays back into space, thus cooling the planet.”
Don’t coal fueled power plants emit sulfur dioxide? Let’s be efficient. Let’s burn coal and save the planet.
And what’s their goal - Snowball Earth?
See if they can beat the Permian-Triassic extinction percentages?
completely bogus. Doesn’t the author realize that according to climate change prophets the sun as absolutely no effect on climate change and that such a tactic won’t work (/s)
Could be the end of mankind... The earth’s self correcting - but something this artificial might tip the scale.
There have been atmospheric experiments going on for years.
Just drop a couple bunker busters down a couple sensitive volcanos if they want to trigger a dark skies scenario.
They’ll get their ‘winter’.