Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

[[What I would love to see is someone challenge it and take it all the way to scotus.]]

NY’s ‘safe act’ was brought, but SC refused to hear it i believe- if i remember right they said it was a state issue-


17 posted on 12/16/2018 9:35:23 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434
NY’s ‘safe act’ was brought, but SC refused to hear it i believe- if i remember right they said it was a state issue-

Your memory is most likely inaccurate since the SCOTUS rarely announces the reasons why it refuses to take a case. Sometimes the reasons have nothing to do with the merits of the case; sometimes the concern is that case could produce a bad precedent. Indeed, if I recall correctly, the NY Safe Act case, if cert had been granted, would have gone to the SCOTUS after Scalia's death, but before the appointment of his replacement, and in all likelihood, the Court would have voted 4 to 4 to affirm the lower court decision, and effectively bar challenges to the Safe Act at a future date.

60 posted on 12/16/2018 12:20:23 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson