Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/26/2018 5:04:34 AM PST by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: w1n1

I’m sure it was effective in up close fighting.


2 posted on 12/26/2018 5:09:36 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

It was the weirdest “feeling” weapon I’ve ever fired. You could hear and feel the bolt sliding back and forth and it fired so slow squeezing off one round at a time was no problem. It was more like you began to wonder if the second round was ever going to fire. That’s only a slight exaggeration. It’s beauty is definitely it’s simplicity. And they could bounce around inside a tank all day and still fire Make no mistake, the weapon was excellent for close combat.


4 posted on 12/26/2018 5:16:58 AM PST by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Thanks, great read on this weapon.
The Grease Gun has a legendary place in WW2 weaponry lore. As does the Krummlauf-fitted StG 44.


5 posted on 12/26/2018 5:52:00 AM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
I remember working as a young MP in Europe for REFORGER, while assigned as a Customs Inspector for the 42nd MP Group.

A returning tanker (Cali National Guard, aspiring gang-banger) had three of them in his footlocker, with a story about taking care of his own and two friends.

Big heart, doncha know?

Anyway, my first up-close look at the things, when I had to confiscate and inventory the damned things.

Stamped pieces, somewhat crudely assembled, visible welds, poor fitment...all in all, a seemingly useless piece of junk.

Long story short, in a later debrief, I found out just how effective they were when a weapons expert described the rate of fire, etc.

Nasty little buggers, especially for what Uncle had invested in them and the quite crude manufacturing techniques involved in putting them in the field.

I believe, but not really sure, that they are out of the active inventory, but I still remember that incident and wonder just how many made it into the war chests of all the gang-bangers so prevalent back then.

Probably much more than will ever be admitted to.

6 posted on 12/26/2018 5:54:33 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
VIDEO
9 posted on 12/26/2018 6:08:19 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true; I have no proof .... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

This was cut and pasted into your blog from a 2011 article in the defunct “examiner” blog. This is a link to an archive of the original. http://archive.is/LAhem

You don’t get to cut and paste articles into your blog and then post them here as clickbait as though you wrote them and own the copyright (which would still be cheesy since you’d be using FR donations to promote your own business).

*************

M3 Grease Gun

The M3 ‘grease gun’ was a rude, crude, effective submachine gun that saw service from the Korean War through the late 1990s.

The M3 “grease gun” was one of the simplest, ugliest, and cheapest personal weapons ever fielded by the U.S. military. But, as one U.S. Marine combat veteran recalled, what this crude submachine gun lacked in looks, it more than made up for that with brutal effectiveness.

“The first time I went to use my rifle, it went ‘click’, so I busted it over a rock and picked up a dead Marine’s grease gun,” said USMC Korean War veteran Don Campbell. “I was lethal with the grease gun. It worked really well on the enemy.” Campbell made his remarks at a machine gun shoot after firing a grease gun for the first time since he served in combat over 60 years ago.

The original M3 submachine gun was commissioned shortly before the U.S. entered World War II as a replacement for the Thompson M1928 submachine gun. The Thompson, although a popular and effective weapon, was not well suited to the demands of wartime high-volume manufacturing.

Loading video
Thompson production called for skilled machinists to perform many complicated machine operations and required large quantities of high grade steel. The result was a weapon that was expensive to manufacture and slow to produce. What was needed instead was barrel, bolt, and firing mechanism.

The one-piece telescoping wire stock can be removed and used as a cleaning rod, disassembly tool and, on the later M3A1 variant, as a magazine loader.

THE GREASE GUN is a compact weapon with an overall length of 29.8 inches with the stock extended and 22.8 inches with the stock collapsed. The barrel is 8 inches long. The 8.15-pound empty weight of the gun is brought up to 10.25 pounds once a loaded magazine of 30 .45 ACP rounds is inserted.

The M3 is blowback operated and fires from an open bolt. An external cocking handle is used to retract the bolt. The weapon fires fully automatic only at a listed cyclic rate of 450 rounds per minute. The ejection port cover doubles as a safety by locking the bolt in place when closed. The 30-round box magazine is a double-column, singlefeed design based on the STEN.

Personal accounts from WWII indicate the weapon was initially greeted with skepticism by many troops who were used to the more refined Thompson and the finely made M-1 Garand. The tubular sheet-metal design led to the nicknames “grease gun” and “cake decorator,” after two common implements of the day.

The grease gun’s attributes became evident in use: The weapon’s simple construction and operation made field maintenance straightforward. The gun’s relatively slow cyclic rate allowed skilled shooters to easily fire short bursts, or even single shots, to help ensure that more of the 230-grain .45 ACP rounds found the enemy.

The design was simplified even more with the M3A1 modification. The cocking handle, which had a tendency to break in use, was removed and instead a hole was drilled in the bolt. To load the gun the soldier simply inserted his finger in the hole and pulled the bolt back by hand. This model also included several other small improvements.

With the stock closed the grease gun is more compact than the Thompson. The ejection port cover acts as a safety so that, at least in theory, the gun can be carried with the magazine inserted, bolt retracted, and the cover closed. In practice, the gun was still known to fire if dropped and the ejection port cover was knocked open by the impact.

“I had an accidental discharge with my gun,” Campbell recalled. “I missed the members of my squad by 8 or 10 feet. After that they issued an order that I could only carry the grease gun when I was in front of the main line of resistance.”

I’VE HAD A CHANCE to fire the M3A1 grease gun on two separate occasions. At first glance the weapon’s appearance is off-putting. The metal is roughly finished and the welds can best be described as “functional.” The stamped-sheet metal trigger seems especially cheap.

Overall, the gun reminded me of vintage stamped tin toys from the same era. However, when I picked it up, I was surprised by the heft. Although the body is stamped sheet metal, the bolt is machined from a solid chunk of steel, and makes up a significant portion of the total weight.

The fixed sights are a simple rear peep and front post. They are
supposedly regulated at 100 yards, which I believe is optimistic for the .45 ACP cartridge. I found the M3A1 to be simple to operate. The ejection port cover is easy to manipulate and, while it seems weird to insert your finger in a hole in the bolt to cock the weapon, it does work. The magazine well is generous and the magazine locks in easily.

There is no selector, so if the dust cover is open, the weapon is ready to fire. The gun’s slow 450 rounds-per minute cyclic rate makes it easy to fire short two- or three-round bursts or even single shots. In fact, I found it harder to make myself hold down the trigger to fire long bursts than to fire short bursts.

I did find that longer bursts tended to go up and to the right, but since it was so easy to double-tap or triple-tap the target with short bursts, I didn’t see this as much of a problem. The slow rate of fire gives it a distinctive “feel” as it chugs along and it seemed as easy to use and accurate as any of the SMGs of that era.

By the end of WWII, more than 600,000 M3 and 15,000 M3A1 SMGs had been produced by GM’s Guide Lamp division. An additional 33,000 M3A1s were manufactured by the Ithaca Gun Company for use during the Korean War. Besides use by the U.S. military, the grease gun was provided to allies as military assistance.

The weapon saw active combat service in the Greek Civil War, Korean War, and Vietnam War, among other conflicts. The grease gun was used by the U.S. as a personal weapon for armor crewman as late as the 1990s and is still in service in some parts of the world. Not a bad record for weapon that began as a wartime expedient.

Story and Photos by Rob Reed
Photos by John Bosio


11 posted on 12/26/2018 6:12:43 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
My father started the Korean war ( he was an NCO ) with a Tommy gun which he said was heavy and needed cleaning a lot. That was quickly taken away and he was issued an M-1 carbine, the fully automatic one. He like it a lot but said beyond 50 yards it's stopping power was greatly diminished. He said the .45 round was effective beyond 100 yards and would easily bring down a man at that range. He traded the M-1 carbine for a grease gun from a Sherman tank crew member, who he said was drunk at the time.

He LOVED the grease gun. He said he didn't really clean it very much, and it was much easier and lighter than the Tommy gun.

14 posted on 12/26/2018 6:21:00 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

An automatic .45 OUTSTANDING . I had never seen one of these , (heard the phrase “grease gun” before) but I love the K.I.S.S. rule so aptly applied here. What a beautiful , simple and effective design for a weapon .


16 posted on 12/26/2018 6:49:22 AM PST by mythenjoseph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
Because of the stupid and unconstitutional NFA and GCA, the damn things are $20,000+ for a legally transferable one.....

….or onl ($100.00 if you survive the cartel arms merchant transaction)

43 posted on 12/26/2018 9:57:19 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

When I was stationed in a Cav unit in Ft Carson, 1996; they had a few of these in the Armory. I couldn’t believe it. I think they were turned in not too long after, shame I didn’t have a chance to fire it. Held one though. Pretty cool.


45 posted on 12/26/2018 10:14:27 AM PST by vpintheak (Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

A few years ago I inherited several boxes of US Military 9mm ammo dated 1966. Curious as to it’s application I did some research and found that one of the grease gun variants was chambered in 9mm for supply to WW2 resistance fighters in Europe where 9mm was plentiful when liberated from Nazi stockpiles. Not wanting to use these hotter rounds in my M9 I traded them to a dealer.


47 posted on 12/26/2018 10:28:17 AM PST by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

If you want to see somebody manipulating a grease gun like he was born to it, watch Steve McQueen in “Hell is for Heroes.”

The safety on the M3 is the dust cover. If it’s closed, it locks the bolt in place and can’t be fired. If it’s open, the weapon is ready to rock’n’roll.

So every time McQueen’s character moves “administratively” or sets the gun down, he closes the dust cover. And when it’s “Front Toward Enemy” time, he flips it open. He’s so deft with it, if I didn’t know better I could swear he’d done that for a living. Like maybe from 1947 to 1950.


61 posted on 12/26/2018 6:56:41 PM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I always thought they were really cool.

When I was little, when we played “war,” (as in the Vic Morrow TV show, or The Rat Patrol,”) we used to use caulking guns as our “Grease Guns.”

I once had a chance to fire one of the earlier models, that had a charging lever. Later models were simpler, with an indentation in the bolt to loop your finger into, to cock the bolt (it fires from an open bolt.) Compared to the Thompson, it had a lower rate of fire, and was lighter and shorter, which made it harder to control.

Mark


64 posted on 12/26/2018 9:37:54 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson